首页|单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术与经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的疗效对比

单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术与经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的疗效对比

扫码查看
目的 对比分析单侧双通道脊柱内镜(UBE)技术与经皮椎间孔镜(PTED)技术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的疗效。方法 回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月在东莞市茶山医院确诊为腰椎椎管狭窄症的患者 40 例,根据治疗方式不同分为经皮椎间孔镜技术(PTED)组与单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术(UBE)组,每组 20 例。比较 2 组围手术期资料,包括手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、减压程度和并发症。收集术前以及术后 3 d、1 个月、6 个月视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分数据,采用SPSS 22。0 软件进行分析。结果 2 组在手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间等方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);UBE组与PTED组相比术后并发症发生率降低(P=0。001)。术后各时间点,UBE组腰腿痛的VAS和ODI评分较PTED组改善明显(均P<0。05)。术后 1 个月,UBE组较PTED组硬膜囊横截面积、椎间孔面积增加更为显著,差异有统计学意义(t=3。842,P=0。003;t=2。469,P=0。006)。结论 UBE相比于PTED在临床效果、减压程度方面更具优势,且并发症发生率更低,是治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的切实安全可行的手术方式。
Efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery versus percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating lumbar spinal stenosis
Objective To compare the efficacies of unilateral biportal endoscopic(UBE)technique and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PTED)in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods Forty patients who were diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis in Chashan Hospital of Dongguan from January 2019 to January 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study.They were divided into PTED group(n=20)and UBE group(n=20).Perioperative data(operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative hospital stay,degree of decompression and complications)were compared between the two groups.Visual analogue scale(VAS)score and Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI)were collected before surgery and on 3 days,1 month and 6 months after surgery.Results There were no significant differences in the operation time,intraoperative bleeding,or hospitalization time between the two groups(all P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the UBE group was significantly lower than that in the PTED group(P=0.001).VAS score and ODI of the low back and leg pains in the UBE group were superior to the PTED group at each postoperative time point(all P<0.05).One month after surgery,the UBE group had a more significant increase in the dural sac cross-sectional area and intervertebral foramen area than the PTED group(t=3.842,P=0.003;t=2.469,P=0.006).Conclusion Compared with PTED,UBE has better clinical outcomes,higher degree of decompression,and lower incidence of complications.UBE is a safe and feasible surgical method for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Unilateral biportal endoscopic spinalPercutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy techniqueLumbar spinal stenosis

王泽民、卢炯文、蔡仲斌、谢玉娟、徐响林、刘海新、卢健祺

展开 >

523000 广东 东莞,东莞市茶山医院骨外科

单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术 经皮椎间孔镜技术 腰椎椎管狭窄症

广东省东莞市社会发展科技重点项目

20211800905162

2024

海军医学杂志
海军医学研究所

海军医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.518
ISSN:1009-0754
年,卷(期):2024.45(7)