首页|NLR、MLR、PLR变化水平对射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者心功能的预测价值及临床意义

NLR、MLR、PLR变化水平对射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者心功能的预测价值及临床意义

扫码查看
目的:探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)变化水平对射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者心功能的预测价值及临床意义.方法:选取2019年4月—2022年4月石河子大学医学院第一附属医院心内科收治的225例HFrEF患者作为研究组,选取同时期住院且除心力衰竭以外的160例患者作为对照组.比较两组患者入院时的一般资料、血常规、生化、超声心动图等情况,计算NLR、MLR、PLR,分析3个指标与左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末内径(LVEDD)、舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)、N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)的相关性,ROC曲线分析3个指标在HFrEF患者中的预测价值.结果:HFrEF组患者NLR、MLR、PLR、LVEDD、EDV、ESV水平均高于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(Z=-13.616、-9.413、-8.591,P<0.001;t= 20.202、12.684、24.312,P<0.001);HFrEF组患者LVEF低于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(t=-55.219,P<0.001).NLR、MLR、PLR与LVEDD、EDV、ESV、NT-proBNP呈正相关,与LVEF呈负相关,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001).NLR在HFrEF患者中的预测价值最高.结论:NLR、MLR、PLR与HFrEF的发生、发展具有一定的关系,NLR、MLR、PLR越高,HFrEF患者的心力衰竭症状越严重,为HFrEF的临床诊断与治疗提供了一定参考.
Predictive Value and Clinical Significance of NLR,MLR,and PLR Change Levels on Cardiac Function in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
Objective:To investigate the predictive value and clinical significance of the level of changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio(MLR),and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR)on cardiac function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF).Methods:225 patients with HFrEF admitted to the hospital from April 2019 to April 2022 were selected as the study group,and 160 patients hospitalized at the same stage and with the exception of heart failure were selected as the control group.General information,blood routine,biochemistry,and echocardiography at the time of admission were compared between the two groups.The correlation of NLR,MLR,and PLR with left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter(LVEDD),end-diastolic volume(EDV),end-systolic volume(ESV),and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide proteins(NT-proBNP)were calculated,and the predictive value of the three indices was analyzed by the ROC curve in patients with HFrEF.Results:The levels of NLR,MLR,PLR,LVEDD,EDV,and ESV in the HFrEF group were higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(Z=-13.616,-9.413,-8.591,P<0.001;t=20.202,12.684,24.312,P<0.001).LVEF in the HFrEF group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-55.219,P<0.001).NLR,MLR,and PLR were positively correlated with LVEDD,EDV,ESV,and NT-proBNP,and negatively correlated with LVEF,with statistically significant differences(P<0.001).NLR had the highest predictive value in patients with HFrEF.Conclusion:NLR,MLR,and PLR have a certain relationship with the occurrence and development of HFrEF,and the higher the NLR,MLR,and PLR,the more severe the symptoms of heart failure in patients with HFrEF,which provides a certain reference for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HFrEF.

Heart failureHeart failure with reduced ejection fractionNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioMonocyte to lymphocyte ratioPlatelets and lymphocyte ratio

于坚、罗奇、王江涛、王小红、杜晴晴、王丽

展开 >

石河子大学医学院第一附属医院心内三科,新疆 石河子 832008

石河子大学医学院,新疆 石河子 832000

心力衰竭 射血分数降低型心力衰竭 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值 血小板与淋巴细胞比值

跨区域心力衰竭专科联盟建设及标准化诊治体系示范项目国家卫生健康委中亚高发病防治重点实验室项目

2020AB0232020-PT330-003

2024

黑龙江医学
中华医学会黑龙江分会

黑龙江医学

影响因子:0.714
ISSN:1004-5775
年,卷(期):2024.48(5)
  • 23