首页|讨论式案例教学法在冠心病介入治疗培训中的应用

讨论式案例教学法在冠心病介入治疗培训中的应用

扫码查看
目的:评价讨论式案例教学法在冠心病介入学员带教中的应用效果及可行性.方法:选取2020年1月1日-2022年12月31 日于南京医科大学附属南京医院心血管内科学习的86名冠心病介入培训学员,将其随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各43人.实验组学员采用讨论式案例教学法培训,对照组学员采用传统授课式培训.教学结束后,比较两组学员的理论考试、实践操作考核以及调查问卷成绩.结果:实验组学员理论考试成绩及总成绩均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=4.515、3.007,P<0.05).实验组学员对授课方式是否满意及培训课程能否有助于自己将来独立开展手术两项成绩明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.910、3.806,P<0.05).结论:相较于传统教学模式,讨论式案例教学法在冠心病介入学员带教中效果明确且具可行性.
Application of Case-discussion Teaching Method in the Training of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Objective:To evaluate the application effect and feasibility of case-discussion teaching method in the training of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods:86 students were enrolled during the training of percutaneous coronary intervention in the department of cardiology in the hospital.They were randomly divided into observation group(n=43)and control group(n=43).The observation group received case-discussion teaching method,while the control group received traditional teaching method.After the period of training,students'performance in theoretical examination,clinical practice skill assessment and satisfaction with the teaching method was compared between the two groups.Results:The score of theoretical examination and the total score in the observation group were significantly higher than that in the control group(t=4.515,3.007;P<0.05).The observation group was significantly higher than the control group in terms of whether they were satisfied with the teaching method and whether the training course would help them independently to perform PCI(t=3.910,3.806;P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared to the traditional teaching methods,the case-discussion teaching method has a definite and feasible effect in the training of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Case-discussion teaching methodCoronary heart diseaseInterventionTraining

吴志明、吴向起、尤威、甘建祥、孟培娜

展开 >

南京医科大学附属南京医院·南京市第一医院心内科,江苏 南京 210006

讨论式案例教学 冠心病 介入 培训

2024

黑龙江医学
中华医学会黑龙江分会

黑龙江医学

影响因子:0.714
ISSN:1004-5775
年,卷(期):2024.48(23)