首页|我国证券特别代表人诉讼启动机制的反思与完善

我国证券特别代表人诉讼启动机制的反思与完善

扫码查看
通过检视既有制度及实践发现,我国现有特别代表人诉讼启动机制存在程序启动权属不明、递进式启动方式欠妥、前置程序适用不当等问题.虽然域外证券群体诉讼区分为私人执法模式和公共执法模式两类,但将司法审查嵌入证券群体诉讼的启动阶段、采用平行式的启动方式是其通行做法,且制度的良好效果已被实践证实.我国证券特别代表人诉讼启动机制可从增设启动阶段的司法审查机制、变更递进式启动方式为平行式启动方式、宽松选案规则中前置程序的要求等三个层面予以完善.
Reflection and Improvement of the Initiation Mechanism of China's Securities Special Representative Litigation
By examining the institutional model of China's existing special representative litigation initiation mechanism and combi-ning the representative cases that have been concluded,it is found that the initiation mechanism has problems such as unclear ownership of the initiation,inappropriate progressive initiation,inappropriate application of pre-procedures.Although extrater-ritorial securities group litigation is divided into private law enforcement mode and public law enforcement mode,it is a com-mon practice to embed judicial review in the initiation stage of securities group litigation,adopt parallel initiation methods,and the good effect of the system has been confirmed by practice.China's securities special representative litigation initiation mech-anism can be improved at three levels:adding a judicial review mechanism at the initiation stage,changing the progressive initi-ation method to a parallel initiation method,relaxing the requirements for prior procedures in the case selection rules.

丁朋超

展开 >

吉林大学法学院,吉林长春 130012

证券特别代表人诉讼 启动机制 递进式 选案机制

教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金广东省研究生示范课程建设项目广东财经大学民商法学创新团队项目

23YJC8200082023SFKC_0342021WCXTD016

2024

河南大学学报(社会科学版)
河南大学

河南大学学报(社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.917
ISSN:1000-5242
年,卷(期):2024.64(3)
  • 19