首页|基于"五性"评价模型的学术期刊高质量发展研究

基于"五性"评价模型的学术期刊高质量发展研究

扫码查看
"五性"指的是学术期刊的社会引领性、学术严谨性、作者友好性、读者友好性与数字适应性.它是评价学术期刊质量好坏的五个基本维度,它们之间相互紧密联系,缺一不可.研究者运用基于五个维度模型设计的问卷对296名人文社科学者进行数字化调研,参加答卷的学者对我国人文社科学术期刊的总体印象和评价打分不高,仅仅达到合格水平,尤其是学术期刊的作者友好性维度平均得分仅有52.51(百分制).为了推动我国人文社科学术期刊可持续地高质量发展,也为了全面改善学界对人文社科学术期刊的总体评价印象,要大力加强学术期刊在伦理引领和责任引领方面的能力建设,在学术定位和学术创新方面做大量的努力,既要提升学术期刊的数字适应性又要避免过度追求流量,不能忘记学术期刊为作者和读者服务的初心.
A Development Report of the Quality of China's Humanities and Social Sciences Academic Journals based on a Five-dimension Mod-el of Evaluation
Academic journals should be of high quality in social leadership,academic rigor,author-friendliness,reader-friendliness,and digital adaptability.These"five characteristics"are the five basic dimensions for evaluating the quality of academic jour-nals.Each of them reflects the quality of academic journals from different aspects.In order to fully reflect the quality of aca-demic journals,it is necessary to evaluate them from five dimensions at the same time,all of which are indispensable.At the same time,the five evaluation dimensions of academic journals are also closely related to each other.The theoretical framework of these five dimensions of evaluation can be transformed into a questionnaire framework.Therefore a digital survey of 296 hu-manities and social sciences scholars was conducted by using a questionnaire designed based on a five-dimensional model.The results show that the scholars who participated in the questionnaire did not highly score the overall impression and evaluation of China's humanities and social sciences academic journals,and only reached the minimum-qualified level.In particular,the av-erage score of the author-friendliness dimension is only 52.51.In this case,in order to promote the sustainable and high-quality development of academic journals in the humanities and social sciences in China,we should work together to comprehensively improve the overall evaluation impression of academic journals in the humanities and social sciences,vigorously strengthen the capacity building of academic journals in terms of ethical leadership and social-responsibility leadership,and make a lot of ef-forts in academic positioning and academic innovation,not only to improve the digital adaptability of academic journals but also to avoid excessive pursuit of traffic,and not to forget the original intention of academic journals to serve authors and readers.

何云峰

展开 >

上海师范大学知识与价值科学研究所,上海 200234

学术期刊 高质量发展 期刊评价标准 "五性"评价模型

2024

河南大学学报(社会科学版)
河南大学

河南大学学报(社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.917
ISSN:1000-5242
年,卷(期):2024.64(3)
  • 12