河南大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.64Issue(4) :41-46.DOI:10.15991/j.cnki.411028.2024.04.006

生态环境犯罪司法裁判效能的反思与优化

Reflection and Optimization on the Judicial Judgment Efficiency of Ecological Environment Crimes

董璞玉
河南大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.64Issue(4) :41-46.DOI:10.15991/j.cnki.411028.2024.04.006

生态环境犯罪司法裁判效能的反思与优化

Reflection and Optimization on the Judicial Judgment Efficiency of Ecological Environment Crimes

董璞玉1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 上海师范大学 哲学与法政学院,上海 200234;华东政法大学 刑事法学院,上海 200042
  • 折叠

摘要

生态环境犯罪刑事裁判是中国特色环境资源审判体系中很重要的一环.生态环境犯罪与其他犯罪相比,呈现出以下特征:二审案件数量较多;一审案件服判息诉率相对较低;二审案件发回重审、改判率高.从积极方面理解,生态环境刑事裁判充分发挥了审判监督职能和司法能动性,保证定罪量刑的公平合理性.但从消极方面也暴露出一些问题,具体包括:一审裁判结果争议较大,导致刑事裁判的权威性受到冲击,二审裁判挑战刑事诉讼传统程序性价值,诉讼程序陷入公信力危机.针对这些问题,在环境犯罪二审程序中应坚持践行恢复性司法理念,通过量刑的区分化保障环境司法的协调性;同时,通过规范环境司法鉴定意见的适用,引入隔离式量刑程序,保障一审的裁判效果;从多角度完善生态环境刑事司法制度,提升生态环境刑事裁判的司法效率及社会效果.

Abstract

Criminal adjudication of ecological and environmental crimes is an important part of the environmental resources trial sys-tem with Chinese characteristics.Compared with other crimes,ecological and environmental crimes show the following charac-teristics:the number of cases of second instance is relatively high;the rate of first-instance cases that have been accepted and settled is relatively low;and the rate of remand and revision is high.On the positive side,ecological and environmental criminal adjudication has given full play to the function of trial supervision and judicial activism to ensure the fairness and reasonableness of conviction and sentencing.However,from the negative side,some problems have also been exposed,specifically including:the results of first-instance adjudication are highly controversial,resulting in the authority of criminal adjudication being im-pacted,second-instance adjudication challenges the traditional procedural value of criminal proceedings,and the litigation process is caught in a credibility crisis.In response to these problems,the concept of restorative justice has been consistently practiced in the second-instance procedures for environmental crimes,and the coordination of environmental justice has been safeguarded through the differentiation of sentencing.At the same time,by standardizing the application of environmental judi-cial opinions,the introduction of segregated sentencing procedures to safeguard the adjudication effect of the first trial.It im-proves the ecological environment criminal justice system from multiple angles,and enhances the judicial efficiency and effect of ecological environment criminal adjudication.

关键词

环境犯罪/司法裁判/司法效能

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA161)

国家社会科学基金重点项目(19AFX008)

出版年

2024
河南大学学报(社会科学版)
河南大学

河南大学学报(社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.917
ISSN:1000-5242
参考文献量12
段落导航相关论文