首页|教育社会化的两种类型:涂尔干与康德的争执

教育社会化的两种类型:涂尔干与康德的争执

扫码查看
涂尔干从对社会事实的肯定和规定出发,认为教育是年轻一代系统地社会化的过程.他由此对康德的教育规定"教育在于使每个人的所有能力得到完美的发展"提出了严肃的批评,认为它脱离了具体的社会规定,变成了理想化的教育.教育的性质是社会性的而不是非社会性的.然而,涂尔干的批判又存在盲点,他没有看到康德的"非社会的社会性"以及由此推导出的教育规定——教育是促进年轻一代"非社会的社会化"的活动.康德在他的历史哲学以及教育学的"林喻"中阐述了他对教育的这种规定.现代教育学人,有必要将"非社会的社会性"作为核心范畴纳入教育学之中,因为这直接涉及一个关键问题:能动的、有情有欲的、非社会性的个体,如何成为依赖他人、与他人合作的、社会性的存在.
The Two Types of Educational Socialization:Durkheim and Kant's Dispute
Starting from the affirmation and regulation of social facts,Durkheim considers education to be a systematic process of socialization across generations.From this perspective,he seriously criticizes Kant's definition of education—that education is about the perfect development of all human capacities—arguing that it detaches from specific social regulations and becomes an idealized concept of education.The nature of education is social,not non-social.However,Durkheim's critique has its blind spots;he fails to recognize Kant's concept of"non-social sociality"and the educational prescription derived from it—that education is an activity that promotes the"non-social socialization"of the younger generation.Kant elaborates on this definition of education in his philosophy of history and through the"forest metaphor"in his educational studies.Modern educators should incorporate the core category of"non-social sociality"into educational studies,as it directly relates to a key question:how does an autonomous,emotional,and desiring,non-social individu-al become a social being who depends on and cooperates with others?

socialization of educationnon-social socialityDurkheimKantforest metaphor

李长伟

展开 >

湖州师范学院 教师教育学院,浙江 湖州 313000

湖南师范大学 古典教育研究中心,湖南 长沙 410081

教育社会化 非社会的社会性 涂尔干 康德 林喻

全国教育科学规划课题国家一般项目

BAA230046

2024

湖南师范大学教育科学学报
湖南师范大学

湖南师范大学教育科学学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.945
ISSN:1671-6124
年,卷(期):2024.23(3)