首页|法律实证主义的价值论问题——制度法论的解决方案与反思

法律实证主义的价值论问题——制度法论的解决方案与反思

扫码查看
"是"与"应当"的二分自休谟提出以来,经过康德的阐发而逐渐渗透到法哲学研究领域,构成法律实证主义理论脉络中的隐匿线索.制度法论通过"制度事实"的概念架起了事实与规范之间的理论联系,运用法律原则的工具实现了价值与规范的汇合,借助实践理性的范畴消解了事实与价值的背景差异.制度法论尝试构建一种融合事实、规范和价值的法律理论分析框架,以法律体系的开放性来回应价值论意义上的休谟问题.然而,"原始事实"与"制度事实"的二分无法有效地回应规范命题,"制度事实"的概念是对规范与价值间界限的混淆,规则体系在事实的前提中隐晦地演绎出规范性的内涵.制度法论虽然立意新颖,观点独特,但仍然陷入了事实、规范与价值的纠缠.
The Axiology of Legal Positivism——Solutions and Reflections on Institutions of Law
Since the dichotomy of"is"and"should"was put forward by Hume,it has gradually penetrated into the field of research of legal philosophy through Kant's elucidation,and constitutes an implicit clue in the theoretical context of legal positivism.Institutions of Law establishes the theoretical link between fact and norm through the concept of"institutional fact",uses the tool of legal principle to realize the convergence of value and norm,eliminates the background difference be-tween fact and value with the help of the category of practical rationality.All in all,Institutions of law tries to construct a legal interpretation and legal analysis framework that integrate fact,norm and value,and responds to Hume's problem in the sense of axiology with the openness of the legal system.However,the dichotomy between"original fact"and"institutional fact"can-not effectively respond to normative proposition;the concept of"institutional fact"confuses the boundary between norm and value;the rule system implicitly deduces normative connotation from the premise of fact,which violates the"Hume's law".In short,although the theory of Institutions of Law have novel ideas and unique viewpoints,it is still caught in the entanglement of fact,norm and value.

Hume's problemlegal positivisminstitutions of lawnstitutional fact

郭栋、陈旭

展开 >

浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州 310008

休谟问题 法律实证主义 制度法论 制度事实

国家社会科学基金青年项目教育部哲学社会科学研究重大项目

22CFX0022023JZDZ012

2024

河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
河南师范大学

河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.475
ISSN:1000-2359
年,卷(期):2024.51(1)
  • 34