首页|明末至晚清传统书目与新学书目对西学的认知及差异

明末至晚清传统书目与新学书目对西学的认知及差异

扫码查看
明末至晚清,受时代变迁和学术变化的影响,出现了传统书 目与新学书 目两种 目录学著作.两种书目对西书均有著录,并通过提要等方式评判西书,尤其重视对科技类、宗教类和史地类西书的讨论,体现出不同的价值取向.它们对科技类西书都较为赞赏,但传统书目多注重其实用性,新学书 目更注重其科学性;对宗教类西书的评述都有否定之词,但传统书目多措辞激烈,新学书 目则更为理性.和传统书 目相比,新学书 目更加重视史地、政法类西书的著录,其评语多涉及对国家、民族问题的思考,体现出一种世界眼光.传统书 目作为专制文化与学术体系下的产物,多在实用价值层面上肯定西书,新学书目则将自身的政治诉求贯穿于西书评述之中,有着不同于传统书目的时代价值.
The Cognition and Difference of Western Learning between Traditional Bibliography and New Bibliography from Late Ming Dynasty to Late Qing Dynasty
From the end of Ming dynasty to the late Qing dynasty,influenced by the changes of times and academia,there appeared two kinds of bibliography works:the traditional bibliography and the new bibliography.The two bibliographies both record Western books and judge them by abstracts,especially by discussing scientific and technical books,religious books and historical and geographical books.They all appreciate Western books on science and technology,but the traditional bibliog-raphy pays more attention to its practicality,while the new bibliography pays more attention to its scientific nature,the new bibliography is more rational.Compared with the traditional bibliography,the new bibliography pays more attention to the de-scription of Western books such as history,geography,politics and law.As the product of autocratic culture and academic sys-tem,traditional bibliography mostly affirms Western books on the level of practical value,has the time value which differs from the traditional bibliography.

Late Ming dynastyQing dynastytraditional bibliographynew learning bibliographywestern learning

谢贵安、程洋洋

展开 >

武汉大学 国学院,湖北武汉 430072

明末 清代 传统书 新学书目 西学

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目

16JJD770037

2024

河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
河南师范大学

河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.475
ISSN:1000-2359
年,卷(期):2024.51(1)
  • 45