首页|论跨境数据流动中的网络间谍规制——以欧美跨境数据流动合作为视角

论跨境数据流动中的网络间谍规制——以欧美跨境数据流动合作为视角

扫码查看
欧美两次跨境数据流动合作失败是基于欧盟对美国新型网络间谍行为的关切,但国际法缺乏对于网络间谍行为的有效规制,以欧盟法处理网络间谍问题也面临着说理困境与诸多批判.欧美两次跨境数据流动合作失败所揭示的境外情报机关向境外企业获取数据的问题对我国具有警示作用,我国也存在未能明确约束境外机构向境外企业调取数据的行为、追究境外机构法律责任的门槛较高、追究境外实体法律责任面临执行和国家豁免的障碍等问题.在国际法层面,我国可以考虑在国际条约中对于情报机关获取信息做出限制,在国际谈判中推广数据分类分级保护模式,尤其注重涉国家安全数据的保护,并逐步推动国际法在规制网络间谍中的适用.在国内法层面,我国可以通过立法明确规制网络间谍行为的新情况,在司法实践中合理解释国家安全,采取出 口管制和反制裁措施惩治网络间谍行为.
On the Regulation of Cyber Espionage in Cross-Border Data Flows——From the Perspective of Cross-Border Data Flows Cooperation Between European Union and the United States
The two failures in cross-border data flows cooperation between European Union and the United States were based on the EU's concerns about the new type of cyber espionage in the United States.However,international law lacks effec-tive regulation of cyber espionage,and EU law also faces reasoning dilemmas and many criticisms when dealing with cyber es-pionage issues.The problem of overseas intelligence agencies obtaining data from overseas enterprises revealed by the two failed cross-border data flows cooperation in EU and the United States has a warning effect on our country.China also faces some problems,including the law fails to clearly restrict the behavior of overseas agencies in accessing data from overseas enterpri-ses;the threshold for pursuing the legal responsibility of foreign agencies is relatively high;and the pursuit of legal liability of overseas entities faces obstacles such as enforcement and state immunity.At the level of international law,China may consider restricting intelligence agencies'access to information in international treaties,promoting our data classification and grading protection method in international negotiations,while paying special attention to the protection of national security data,and gradually promoting the application of international law in regulating cyber espionage.At the legal level of domestic law,China can clearly regulate the new type of cyber espionage through legislation,rationally interpret national security in judicial prac-tice,and adopt export control and counter-sanctions measures to punish cyber espionage.

cross-border data flowcyber espionage regulationdata protection

刘瑛、赫思瑶

展开 >

中山大学法学院,广东广州 510275

跨境数据流动 网络间谍规制 数据保护

国家社会科学基金重大项目

21&ZD207

2024

河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
河南师范大学

河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.475
ISSN:1000-2359
年,卷(期):2024.51(4)