首页|行政处罚"首违不罚"中首次识别标准探析

行政处罚"首违不罚"中首次识别标准探析

Analysis of Identification Standard of the"First Violation"in Administrative Penalty"No punishment for first violation"

扫码查看
2021年新修订的《行政处罚法》第33条第1款规定了"首违不罚"制度,由此适用的合法性得到确认.就法理基础来看,制度内含了"处罚与教育相结合""过罚相当""处罚便宜与处罚法定"三种逻辑原则的有机统一,就其设立目标而言,包含了"改善营商环境""促进社会和谐""提升行政执法效能"三重目标取向.实务中,各执法部门适用"首违不罚"制度,特别是对"首次"的规范界定和适用边界缺乏统一标准,导致了各地裁量结果的差异现象,需要准确具体认定"首次"的概念,并在适用边界中,对起讫范围、空间范围和领域范围三个层面进行界定.从而进一步推动"首违不罚"制度在法制轨道上运行.
The newly revised Article 33(1)of the Administrative Penalty Law in 2021 stipulates the"no punishment for first violation"system,which confirms the legality of its application.From a legal perspective,the system contains an organic unity of three logical principles:"combining punishment with education","equivalent punishment",and"cheap punishment with legal punishment".In terms of its goals,it includes three goals:"improving the business environment","promoting social harmony",and"enhancing administrative law enforcement efficiency".In practice,there is a lack of unified standards for the application of the"no punishment for first violation"system by various law enforcement departments,especially in the standardized definition and application boundaries of"first violation",which has led to differences in discretionary results in different regions.It is necessary to accurately and specifically identify the concept of"first violation"and define the scope of origin and destination,spatial scope,and domain scope in the application boundaries.Thus further promoting the operation of the"no punishment for first violation"system on the legal track.

no punishment for first violationadministrative penaltiesidentification standardsapplicable boundaries

沈开举、陈小康

展开 >

郑州大学,河南郑州 450001

首违不罚 行政处罚 识别标准 适用边界

国家社会科学基金青年项目

20CFX016

2024

河南司法警官职业学院学报
河南司法警官职业学院

河南司法警官职业学院学报

影响因子:0.203
ISSN:1672-2663
年,卷(期):2024.22(1)
  • 14