河南司法警官职业学院学报2024，Vol.22Issue(3) ：41-49.

论咨询型行政复议委员会的制度困境与实践进路——以《行政复议委员会工作规则(征求意见稿)》为例

On the Institutional Dilemma and Practical Progress of the Advisory Administrative Review Committee——Taking the Working Rules of the Administrative Review Committee(Draft for Opinion)as an Example

李继扬 李耀伯
河南司法警官职业学院学报2024，Vol.22Issue(3) ：41-49.
✕
  • NETL
  • NSTL
  • 万方数据

论咨询型行政复议委员会的制度困境与实践进路——以《行政复议委员会工作规则(征求意见稿)》为例

On the Institutional Dilemma and Practical Progress of the Advisory Administrative Review Committee——Taking the Working Rules of the Administrative Review Committee(Draft for Opinion)as an Example

李继扬 1李耀伯2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 郑州航空工业管理学院,河南郑州 450046
  • 2. 河南大学,河南开封4750000
  • 折叠

摘要

2024年3月12日司法部官网公布的《行政复议委员会工作规则(征求意见稿)》第11条第3款规定行政复议委员会委员享有对相关行政复议案件发表咨询意见,就有关事项提出意见建议的权利.然而咨询型行政复议委员会的咨询意见仅是行政复议机关作出复议决定的参考,没有法律强制性,难以保证正确的咨询意见真正得以落实;吸收专家委员参与行政复议一定程度上促进行政复议结果公正,但对于专家委员参与个案的人数下限规定模糊会致使行政复议结果的公正性打折扣;行政复议委员会的受案范围规定过于笼统,不利于行政复议申请人的权利保障.从保证咨询型行政复议委员会意见的权威性、扩充专家委员个案参与的人数、明确行政复议委员会的受案范围分析实践进路.

Abstract

Paragraph 3 of Article 11 of the Working Rules of the Administrative Review Committee(Draft for Opinion),which was published on the official website of the Ministry of Justice on March 12,2024,stipulates that members of the Administrative Review Committee enjoy the right to give advisory opinions on relevant administrative review cases and to make suggestions and recommendations on related matters.However,the advisory opinion of the advisory administrative review committee is only a reference for the administrative review organ to make a review decision,and there is no legal compulsion to ensure that the correct advisory opinion is really implemented;absorbing the expert members to participate in the administrative review to a certain extent promotes the fairness of the result of the administrative review,however,the ambiguous provisions on the lower limit of the number of the expert members to participate in the case will The fairness of the results of administrative reconsideration will be compromised;the scope of the administrative reconsideration committee is too general,which is not conducive to the protection of the rights of the applicant for administrative reconsideration.We analyze the practical way forward from ensuring the authority of the opinion of the advisory administrative review committee,expanding the number of expert members to participate in individual cases,and clarifying the scope of cases accepted by the administrative review committee.

关键词

咨询型行政复议委员会/咨询意见/专家委员/受案范围

Key words

advisory administrative review board/advisory opinion/expert member/scope of cases

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
河南司法警官职业学院学报
河南司法警官职业学院

河南司法警官职业学院学报

影响因子：0.203
ISSN：1672-2663
段落导航相关论文