首页|"部分篡改型"虚假诉讼行为入罪研究

"部分篡改型"虚假诉讼行为入罪研究

A Study on the Criminalization of"Partially Falsified"False Litigation

扫码查看
《刑法修正案(九)》明确将虚假诉讼行为纳入刑法打击范畴,但针对"部分篡改型"虚假诉讼行为的罪与非罪,实践中类案不同判的问题仍比较突出.为实现法律效果与社会效果的统一,从刑法入罪原意解读"部分篡改"归类于主观"捏造",并根据"部分篡改型"虚假诉讼行为侵害司法秩序和他人合法权益的客观情况,设置"数额加比例"的入罪标准提高罪名适用的准确性,从行为犯、结果犯两个层面考量"部分篡改型"虚假诉讼行为的既遂,更利于司法公正适用法律.
The Criminal Law Amendment(Ⅸ)explicitly includes false litigation behavior in the scope of criminal punishment,but the problem of different judgments on the crime or non-crime of"partially altered"false litigation behavior in practice is still quite prominent.In order to achieve the unity of legal and social effects,the"partially altered"should be classified as subjective"fabrication"from the perspective of the original intent of criminal liability,and an entry-of-crime standard based on the objective situation of infringing judicial order and others'legitimate rights by"partially altered"false litigation behavior should be set to enhance the accuracy of the crime name application.It is more conducive to judicial justice to consider the completion of"partially altered"false litigation behavior from both the behavioral crime and result crime levels.

false litigation crime"partially tampered type"false litigation actsconcoct

罗苟新、刘兵、任楚寒

展开 >

西华师范大学,四川 南充 637000

南充市高坪区人民检察院,四川 南充 637000

虚假诉讼罪 "部分篡改型" 虚假诉讼行为 捏造

2024

河南司法警官职业学院学报
河南司法警官职业学院

河南司法警官职业学院学报

影响因子:0.203
ISSN:1672-2663
年,卷(期):2024.22(4)