首页|论亲友"帮助立功"的合法性与立功"有效性"——以"乐清8·26"持刀砍人案为视角

论亲友"帮助立功"的合法性与立功"有效性"——以"乐清8·26"持刀砍人案为视角

On the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of Family and Friends'Assistance in Achieving Merit——From the Perspective of"Yueqing-8·26-Case"

扫码查看
《关于办理职务犯罪案件认定自首、立功等量刑情节若干问题的意见》(以下简称《意见》)中对立功的判断标准作出规定,但立功的线索来源与有效性认定条件在司法解释中规定不足,且内容模糊,无法满足实际需求.以"乐清8·26"持刀砍人案为样本,试图揭示立功在实体以及程序合法性认定中的不足之处,期待为立功制度的司法适用提供新的研究视角.
《The Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Determination of Sentencing Circumstances such as Voluntary Surrender and Meritorious Deeds in Handling Duty-related Criminal Cases》have already stipulated the criteria of meritorious deeds,but the source of clues for meritorious deeds and the conditions for determining the validity of such cases are insufficiently stipulated in judicial interpretations.Moreover,the contents of this legal determinations are almost ambiguous and cannot meet actual needs.This article takes"the Yueqing-8·26-case"for example,attempting to reveal the deficiencies of substantive and procedural legitimacy in determination of such cases,and expecting to provide a new perspective for judicial application of the meritorious deeds.

legitimacy of meritorious deedssource of cluesburden of proofcriteria for determining validity

梁晓菲

展开 >

北京艾迪福克斯软件技术公司,北京 100038

立功合法性认定 线索来源 举证责任 有效性认定标准

2024

河南司法警官职业学院学报
河南司法警官职业学院

河南司法警官职业学院学报

影响因子:0.203
ISSN:1672-2663
年,卷(期):2024.22(4)