首页|静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉对化疗后肺癌患者心肌保护及免疫水平的影响

静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉对化疗后肺癌患者心肌保护及免疫水平的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉对化疗后肺癌患者的心肌保护及免疫水平的影响.方法 选取2021年1月至2023年1月河南省胸科医院收治的化疗后行肺癌根治术的肺癌患者112例作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为研究组、参照组,各56例.参照组接受静吸复合麻醉方案,研究组接受全凭静脉麻醉方案.比较两组临床指标[拔管/术后清醒/手术/麻醉起效/定向力恢复/听从指令时间、术中出血量、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)].以术前(T0)、插管侧位双肺通气15 min(T1)、单肺通气15 min(T2)、单肺通气30 min(T3)、单肺通气60 min(T4)为时间点,比较两组血流动力学指标[心率(HR)、平均动脉血压(MAP)]水平.以麻醉诱导前(t0)、手术即刻时(t1)、术后6 h(t2)、术后12 h(t3)为时间点,比较两组心肌肌钙蛋白Ⅰ(cTnⅠ)水平.以术前、术后1 d、术后7 d为时间节点,比较两组免疫功能指标(CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+)水平及并发症发生情况.结果 研究组麻醉起效、拔管、定向力恢复、听从指令、术后清醒时间均短于参照组,术后VAS评分均低于参照组(P<0.05);T1~T4时间段研究组MAP、HR水平均低于参照组,波动幅度均小于参照组(P<0.05);t2、t3时间点研究组cTnⅠ水平均低于参照组(P<0.05);术后1、7 d研究组CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+水平均高于参照组(P<0.05);研究组术后并发症总发生率(8.93%)低于参照组(23.21%)(P<0.05).结论 静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉应用于肺癌根治术中,均具有麻醉、镇痛、稳定血流动力学水平的效果,能降低术后并发症发生率和提高免疫功能,但全凭静脉麻醉的麻醉质量更高.
Effects of Intravenous Anesthesia and Intravenous Anesthesia on Myocardial Protection and Immunity in Patients with Lung Cancer After Chemotherapy
Objective To investigate the effects of intravenous anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia on myocardial protection and immunity in patients with lung cancer after chemotherapy.Methods A total of 112 patients with lung cancer who received radical resection after chemotherapy in Henan Provincial Chest Hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were selected as research objects,and divided into study group and reference group according to random number table method,with 56 cases in each group.The control group was given intravenous anesthesia while the study group was given intravenous anesthesia.Clinical indexes[extubation time,postoperative waking time,operation time,anesthesia onset time,orientation recovery time,instruction time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative visual analog score(VAS)]were compared between the two groups.Preoperative(T0),intubation side double-lung ventilation for 15 minutes(T1),single lung ventilation for 15 minutes(T2),single lung ventilation for 30 minutes(T3),single lung ventilation for 60 minutes(T4)were used as time points to compare the hemodynamic indexes[heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure(MAP)]of the two groups.Myocardial troponin Ⅰ(cTnⅠ)levels were compared between the two groups at the time points before anesthesia induction(t0),immediately after surgery(t1),6 hours after surgery(t2)and 12 hours after surgery(t3).The levels of immune function indexes(CD3+,CD4+,CD4+/CD8+)and the incidence of complications between the two groups were compared before surgery,1 and 7 days after surgery.Results The effect of anesthesia,extubation,recovery of orientation,following instructions and postoperative wakefulness time of the study group were all shorter than those of the reference group,and the VAS score of the study group was lower than that of the reference group(P<0.05).MAP and HR levels of the study group were lower than those of the reference group during T1 to T4,and their fluctuation ranges were lower than those of the reference group(P<0.05).The level of cTnⅠ in t2 and t3 time points was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).The levels of CD3+,CD4+,CD4+/CD8+in the study group were higher than those in the control group on 1 and 7 days after surgery(P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the study group(8.93%)was lower than that in the control group(23.21%)(P<0.05).Conclusion In radical operation of lung cancer,both intravenous anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia have the effects of anesthesia,analgesia,stable hemodynamic level,reducing the incidence of postoperative complications,and improving immune function,but the quality of intravenous anesthesia is higher.

intravascular anesthesiaall intravenous anesthesialung cancerimmune function

孟睿、周俊辉、钟巍

展开 >

河南省胸科医院/郑州大学附属胸科医院麻醉科,河南郑州 450000

静吸复合麻醉 全凭静脉麻醉 肺癌 免疫功能

2024

河南医学研究
河南省医学科学院

河南医学研究

影响因子:0.979
ISSN:1004-437X
年,卷(期):2024.33(1)
  • 13