首页|AngioJet机械血栓清除术对急性下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的应用效果

AngioJet机械血栓清除术对急性下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 探究AngioJet机械血栓清除术在急性下肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)患者治疗中的应用效果.方法 选取2019年12月至2022年12月南阳市第一人民医院收治的76例急性下肢DVT患者,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各38例.观察组接受AngioJet机械血栓清除术治疗,对照组接受经皮人工血栓抽吸(MAT)术治疗.比较两组血栓清除率、手术相关指标、患健肢周径差、凝血纤溶指标[纤维蛋白原(FIB)、D-二聚体(D-D)]及术后并发症情况.结果 观察组血栓清除率高于对照组,置管取栓时间短于对照组(P<0.05);术后3、7 d观察组患健侧大腿与小腿周径差小于对照组(P<0.05);术后3、7 d两组纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 AngioJet机械血栓清除术与MAT术治疗急性下肢DVT均能改善患者凝血功能,且具有良好的安全性,但前者在血栓清除率与置管取栓时间上更具优势,也更有利于减轻患侧下肢水肿症状.
Effects of AngioJet Mechanical Thrombus Clearance in Patients with Acute Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis
Objective To investigate the application effects of AngioJet mechanical thrombus removal in the treatment of acute lower limb deep venous thrombosis(DVT).Methods A total of 76 patients with acute lower limb DVT in Nanyang First People's Hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 were selected and divided into observation group and control group by random number table method,with 38 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with AngioJet mechanical thrombus removal,and the control group was treated with percutaneous manual aspiration thrombectomy(MAT).The thrombotic clearance rate,surgical related indexes,circumference difference of the injured limb,coagulation fibrinolysis indexes[fibrinogen(FIB),D-dimer(D-D)]and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The thrombus clearance rate of observation group was higher than that of control group,and the time of thrombus catheterization was shorter than that of control group(P<0.05).The difference between the circumference diameter of the thigh and the calf on the healthy side of the observation group was smaller than that of the control group on 3 and 7 days after operation(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer between the two groups on 3 and 7 days after operation(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Both AngioJet mechanical thrombus clearance and MAT in the treatment of acute lower limb DVT can improve the coagulation function of patients with good overall performance,but the former has more advantages in thrombus clearance rate and catheterization and thrombus removal time,and is more conducive to alleviating the symptoms of lower limb edema on the affected side.

AngioJet mechanical thrombus removalpercutaneous manual aspiration thrombectomylower limb deep venous throm-bosis

陈德才、胡威龙、王高尚

展开 >

南阳市第一人民医院血管外科,河南南阳 473000

AngioJet机械血栓清除术 经皮人工血栓抽吸术 下肢深静脉血栓

2024

河南医学研究
河南省医学科学院

河南医学研究

影响因子:0.979
ISSN:1004-437X
年,卷(期):2024.33(1)
  • 10