首页|不同穿刺针辅助经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果比较

不同穿刺针辅助经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果比较

扫码查看
目的 分析不同穿刺针辅助经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果.方法 采用前瞻性研究,选择2021年1月至2022年12月于南阳市第一人民医院骨科拟接受PVP手术治疗的86例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为常规组与观察组,每组43例.常规组接受直行穿刺针辅助PVP治疗,观察组接受弯角穿刺针辅助PVP治疗.比较两组手术指标、术前术后伤椎相对高度、疼痛程度、椎体功能障碍以及并发症情况.结果 观察组手术时间、术中出血量、骨水泥注入量以及C臂机透视次数均少于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).组内各时点伤椎相对高度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).组内各时点视觉模拟评分法(VAS)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).组内各时点Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组并发症发生率(6.98%)与常规组(11.63%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 直行穿刺针与弯角穿刺针辅助PVP治疗均可以改善患者伤椎状况,缓解疼痛,提高椎体功能,均有较好的临床效果.弯角穿刺针能够缩短手术时间,减少骨水泥注入量和C臂机透视次数,安全性更高.
Clinical Efficacy Comparison of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Assisted by Different Puncture Needles for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)assisted by different puncture needles in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Methods A prospective study was conducted,and 86 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who were scheduled to undergo PVP surgery at Department of Orthopedics of Nanyang First People's Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the study subjects.They were randomly divided into a conventional group and an observation group using a random number table method,with 43 patients in each group.The conventional group received direct puncture needle assisted PVP treatment,while the observation group received curved angle puncture needle assisted PVP treatment.The surgical indicators,relative height of injured vertebrae before and after operation,pain degree,vertebral dysfunction and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The surgical time,intraoperative bleeding,bone cement injection,and C-arm fluoroscopy frequency of the observation group were all lower than those of the conventional group,with statistical differences(P<0.05).There was a statistical difference in the relative height of the injured vertebra at each time point within the group(P<0.05).There was a statistical difference in visual analogue scale(VAS)scores at different time points within the group(P<0.05).There was a statistical difference in the Oswestry disability index(ODI)within groups at different time points(P<0.05).Compared to the conventional group(11.63%),the incidence of complications in the observation group(6.98%)was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Both straight puncture needle and curved puncture needle assisted PVP treatment can improve the patient's injured vertebral condition,alleviate pain,and improve vertebral function,both of which have good clinical effects.The curved angle puncture needle can shorten the surgical time,reduce the amount of bone cement injection and the number of C-arm fluoroscopy,and have higher safety.

osteoporotic vertebral compression fracturepercutaneous vertebroplastycurved angle puncture needlestraight puncture needle

夏俊峰

展开 >

南阳市第一人民医院骨科,河南南阳 473000

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折 经皮椎体成形术 弯角穿刺针 直行穿刺针

2024

河南医学研究
河南省医学科学院

河南医学研究

影响因子:0.979
ISSN:1004-437X
年,卷(期):2024.33(9)
  • 11