首页|阿芬太尼和舒芬太尼用于患者非插管全麻胸腔镜肺楔形切除术的安全性比较

阿芬太尼和舒芬太尼用于患者非插管全麻胸腔镜肺楔形切除术的安全性比较

扫码查看
目的 对比阿芬太尼和舒芬太尼用于非插管全麻胸腔镜肺楔形切除术的安全性.方法 回顾性采集2022年1月至2023年12月于郑州大学第一附属医院使用阿芬太尼经非插管全麻胸腔镜肺楔形切除术治疗的40例患者资料,纳入阿芬太尼组;采集同期于医院使用舒芬太尼经非插管全麻胸腔镜楔形切除术治疗的40例患者资料,纳入舒芬太尼组.患者病历资料、手术资料等资料均保存完整,完成非插管全麻胸腔镜肺楔形切除术.整理患者资料,记录并对比患者血流动力学[麻醉前、切皮时、清醒时的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)]、围手术期指标(麻醉起效时间、苏醒时间、自主呼吸恢复时间)、不良反应.结果 阿芬太尼组与舒芬太尼组麻醉前、切皮时、清醒时的MAP、HR组间对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),相较于麻醉前,切皮时的MAP、HR下降,相较于切皮时,清醒时的MAP、HR上升(P<0.05).阿芬太尼组起效时间、苏醒时间、自主呼吸恢复时间均短于舒芬太尼组(P<0.05),阿芬太尼组不良反应发生率低于舒芬太尼组(P<0.05).结论 阿芬太尼和舒芬太尼用于非插管全麻胸腔镜肺楔形切除术,在稳定患者血流动力学指标方面的效果相当,但是相较之下,阿芬太尼起效快,且患者术后能在短时间内苏醒并恢复自主呼吸,且不良反应少,使用安全性更高.
Comparison of Safety Between Afentanil and Sufentanil for Non Intubated General Anesthesia Thoracoscopic Wedge Resection of the Lung in Patients
Objective To compare the safety of afentanil and sufentanil in non intubated general anesthesia thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted to collect data from 40 patients who underwent non intubated general anesthesia thoracoscopic lung wedge resection with afentanil at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2022 to December 2023,and were included in the afentanil group.Data from 40 patients who underwent non intubated thoracoscopic wedge resection using sufentanil at the same time in the hospital were collected and included in the sufentanil group.The patient's medical records,surgical data,and other related information had been fully preserved,and the non intubated general anesthesia thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung had been completed.Data of patients were collected,patient hemodynamics[mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)before anesthesia,skin cutting,and awake],perioperative indicators(time of anesthesia onset,recovery time,recovery time of spontaneous breathing),and adverse reactions were recorded and compared.Results There was no difference in MAP and HR between the afentanil group and the sufentanil group before anesthesia,during skin cutting,and during wakefulness(P>0.05).Compared to before anesthesia,MAP and HR decreased during skin cutting,while MAP and HR increased during wakefulness compared to skin cutting(P<0.05).The onset time,awakening time,and spontaneous breathing recovery time of the afentanil group were shorter than those of the sufentanil group(P<0.05),and the incidence of adverse reactions in the afentanil group was lower than that in the sufentanil group(P<0.05).Conclusion Alfentanil and sufentanil are equally effective in stabilizing patient hemodynamic parameters during non intubated thoracoscopic wedge resection under general anesthesia.However,compared to afentanil,it has a faster onset of action and allows patients to wake up and regain spontaneous breathing in a short period of time after surgery,with fewer adverse reactions and higher safety when used.

non intubated general anesthesiathoracoscopic wedge resection of lungafentanilsufentanilhemodynamicssecurity

赵飞飞、李军仕、王卫萍、张亚莉

展开 >

郑州大学第一附属医院麻醉与围手术医学部,河南郑州 451162

非插管全麻 胸腔镜肺楔形切除术 阿芬太尼 舒芬太尼 血流动力学 安全性

2024

河南医学研究
河南省医学科学院

河南医学研究

影响因子:0.979
ISSN:1004-437X
年,卷(期):2024.33(13)