首页|关节镜下两种术式治疗肩袖不全撕裂的临床效果

关节镜下两种术式治疗肩袖不全撕裂的临床效果

扫码查看
目的 比较分析关节镜下直接缝合术与关节镜下清理为完全撕裂后再行缝合术治疗肩袖不全撕裂的临床效果.方法 回顾分析中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八九医院平顶山医疗区2016年4月至2019年4月收治的108例肩袖不全撕裂患者的临床资料,分为两组,观察组(54例)接受关节镜下彻底清理磨损退变肌腱组织,造成全层撕裂后再行缝合术;对照组(54例)接受关节镜下简单清理后直接缝合术.记录并比较两组患者的手术时间、术后随访期内复发率;采用肩关节疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评价肩关节疼痛改善程度、采用美国加州大学(UCLA)肩关节评分系统和肩关节活动度(外展角度)评价肩关节功能恢复情况、采用匹斯堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评价睡眠恢复情况.结果 两组患者均按要求随访,时间1~36个月,平均随访(24.7±2.3)个月.所有病例术后无感染、肩关节粘连和神经损伤发生.对照组手术时间短,观察组的手术时间较长,术后1个月、6个月、1 a、3 a随访,两组肩关节VAS评分随时间呈下降趋势,组间比较差异无统计学意义;UCLA肩关节评分呈上升趋势,组间比较差异无统计学意义;肩关节活动度(外展角度)呈上升趋势,组间比较差异无统计学意义;PSQI评分呈下降趋势,组间比较差异无统计学意义.观察组术后复发率为3.7%(2/54),对照组18.5%(10/54),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 关节镜下清理为全层撕裂后再缝合与直接缝合术相比,手术时间延长,但能降低复发率,且不影响肩关节疼痛缓解、睡眠改善和肩关节功能恢复.
Clinical Effects of Two Types of Arthroscopic Surgery for Incomplete Rotator Cuff Tears
Objective To comparative the clinical effects of arthroscopic direct suture versus arthroscopic debridement for incomplete rotator cuff tears followed by suture.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 108 patients with incomplete rotator cuff tear admitted to the Pingdingshan Medical District,the 989th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Joint Logistics Support Force from April 2016 to April 2019.They were divided into two groups.The observation group(54 cases)underwent thorough arthroscopic cleaning of the worn and degenerative tendon tissue,resulting in a full layer tear before undergoing suturing surgery.The control group received simple arthroscopic cleaning and direct suture surgery.The surgical time and recurrence rate during the postoperative follow-up period between the two groups of patients were recorded and compared.The visual analogue scale(VAS)of shoulder pain was used to evaluate the improvement of shoulder pain,the University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA)shoulder score and shoulder range of motion(abduction Angle)were used to evaluate the recovery of shoulder joint function,and the Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI)was used to evaluate the sleep recovery.Results Both groups of patients were followed up as required,with a duration of 1-36 months and an average follow-up of(24.7±2.3)months.All cases had no postoperative infections,shoulder joint adhesions,or nerve injuries.The control group had a shorter surgical time,while the observation group had a longer surgical time.After 1 month,6 months,1 year,and 3 years of follow-up,the VAS scores of the shoulder joints in the two groups showed a decreasing trend over time,and there was no difference between the groups.The UCLA shoulder rating scale showed an upward trend,and there was no difference between groups.The range of motion(abduction angle)of the shoulder joint was on the rise,and there was no significant difference between groups.The PSQI score showed a downward trend,and there was no difference between groups.The postoperative recurrence rate was 3.7%(2/54)in the observation group and 18.5%(10/54)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with direct suture,arthroscopic debridement for full-thickness tear can prolong the operation time,but can reduce the recurrence rate,and does not affect the shoulder pain relief,sleep improvement and shoulder joint function recovery.

incomplete tear of shoulder sleevefull shoulder arthroscopyshoulder peak shaping

成小辉、周红星

展开 >

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第989医院平顶山医疗区骨二科,河南平顶山 467000

肩袖不全撕裂 全肩关节镜 肩峰成形

2024

河南医学研究
河南省医学科学院

河南医学研究

影响因子:0.979
ISSN:1004-437X
年,卷(期):2024.33(14)
  • 16