首页|骶管阻滞联合全身麻醉在低出生体重新生儿腹部手术中的应用

骶管阻滞联合全身麻醉在低出生体重新生儿腹部手术中的应用

扫码查看
目的 观察骶管阻滞联合全身麻醉在低出生体重新生儿腹部手术中的应用效果。方法 选取2020年9月—2022年9月郑州大学第三附属医院的择期行腹部手术的低出生体重新生儿100例,随机数字表法分为两组:骶管阻滞联合全身麻醉组(CG组,n=50)和全身麻醉组(G组,n=50)。两组患儿均采用七氟烷吸入麻醉诱导,气管插管成功后,吸入1~2%七氟烷维持麻醉。G组患儿术中持续泵注瑞芬太尼0。5 μg/(kg·min),CG组患儿于左侧卧位行超声引导下骶管阻滞,骶管腔注入0。2%罗哌卡因1 mL/kg。记录两组患儿手术时间、拔出气管导管时间(从手术结束至拔出气管导管的时间)、麻醉恢复室停留时间;记录两组患儿麻醉诱导前(T0)、气管插管即刻(T1)、切皮(T2)、腹腔探查(T3)、关闭腹腔(T4)、拔出气管导管即刻(T5)及出手术室(T6)的心率、平均动脉压;记录两组患儿苏醒期间及麻醉恢复室停留期间呼吸抑制等不良事件发生情况及术后首次排便时间和住院时间;记录CG组患儿骶管阻滞并发症发生情况。结果 CG组患儿拔出气管导管时间、PACU停留时间明显短于G组患儿(P<0。05);CG组患儿心率在T2~6明显低于G组患儿,平均动脉压在T2~6明显高于G组患儿(P<0。05);CG组患儿在苏醒期间与PACU停留期间呼吸抑制等不良事件的发生率明显低于G组患儿(P<0。05);CG组患儿术后首次排便时间与住院时间明显短于G组患儿(P<0。05),差异均有统计学意义;CG组患儿的骶管相关并发症发生率为0。结论 骶管阻滞联合全身麻醉用于低出生体重新生儿腹部手术,提供更完善的术中镇痛,患儿术中血流动力学稳定,不良反应发生率低,有助于患儿早期康复。
Effection of canal block combined with general anesthesia in abdominal surgery of low birth weight neonates
Objective To observe the effect of caudal block combined with general anesthesia in abdominal surgery of low birth weight neonates.Methods A total of 100 low birth weight neonates who underwent elective abdominal surgery were divided into two groups by random number table method:caudal block combined with general anesthesia group(group CG,n=50)and general anesthesia group(group G,n=50).Neonates in both groups were induced by sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia.After tracheal intubation,1%~2% sevoflurane was inhaled to maintain anesthesia.The neonates in group G were continuously pumped with remifentanil 0.5 μg/(kg·min)during surgery,while the neo-nates in group CG underwent ultrasound-guided caudal block in the left lateral position,and 0.2% ropivacaine 1 mL/kg was injected.The operation time,tracheal tube extraction time(time from the end of surgery to extubation)and the post-anesthesia care unit stay time of the two groups were recorded.Heart rate and mean arterial pressure of the two groups of neonates before anesthesia induction(T0),immediately after tracheal intubation(T1),incision(T2),ab-dominal exploration(T3),closing the abdominal cavity(T4),immediately after extubation(T5)and out of the operat-ing room(T6)were recorded.The occurrence of adverse events such as respiratory depression during the wake-up peri-od and during the post-anesthesia care unit stay in the two groups were recorded.The first defecation time and hospital stay of the two groups of neonates after operation were recorded.And the incidence of complications of caudal block in group CG were recorded.Results The tracheal tube extraction time and the post-anesthesia care unit stay time of group CG were significantly shorter than those in group G(P<0.05).The heart rate of neonates in group CG was signif-icantly lower than that in group G at T2~6,and the mean arterial pressure of neonates in group CG was significantly higher than that in group G at T2~6(P<0.05).The adverse events in group CG were significantly lower than those in group G during the wake-up period and during the post-anesthesia care unit stay(P<0.05).The time of first defecation in group CG was significantly shorter than that in group G,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of sacral canal-related complications in group CG was 0.Conclusion Caudal block combined with general anesthesia is used for abdominal surgery of low birth weight neonates to provide more complete intraoperative analgesia,intraoperative hemodynamic stability,low incidence of adverse reactions,and early recovery.

Caudal blockAbdominal surgeryLow birth weight neonatesGeneral anesthesia

雷鸣、刘茜、卫明谦、方建超、杜宁宁、耿晓媛、董正华、魏晓永

展开 >

郑州大学第三附属医院麻醉科,郑州 450052

骶管阻滞 低体重新生儿 腹部手术 全身麻醉

2024

医药论坛杂志
中华预防医学会,河南省医学情报研究所

医药论坛杂志

影响因子:0.47
ISSN:1672-3422
年,卷(期):2024.45(5)
  • 25