首页|艾司氯胺酮对二次剖宫产术后静脉自控镇痛效果及恢复质量的影响研究

艾司氯胺酮对二次剖宫产术后静脉自控镇痛效果及恢复质量的影响研究

扫码查看
目的 分析艾司氯胺酮对二次剖宫产术后静脉自控镇痛(patient controlled intravenous analgesia,PCIA)效果及恢复质量的影响.方法 选取2021年2月—2022年12月择期在郑州市金水区总医院行椎管内麻醉下二次剖宫产的产妇164例,按PCIA药物不同,将术后采用艾司氯胺酮+托烷司琼+酮咯酸氨丁三醇进行PCIA的82例作为艾司氯胺酮组,将术后采用舒芬太尼+托烷司琼+酮咯酸氨丁三醇进行PCIA的82例作为舒芬太尼组.比较两组术后2、6、12、24、48 h切口视觉模拟疼痛评分及Ramasy镇静评分,术后早期恢复情况,补救镇痛率,48 h内PCIA按压次数及治疗期间不良反应发生情况.结果 两组术后2、6、12、24、48 h切口 VAS评分及Ramasy镇静评分呈先升高后降低趋势(P<0.05),但两组不同时间点的切口 VAS评分及Ramasy镇静评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);艾司氯胺酮组术后24 h及48h40项恢复质量量表(QoR40)评分中身体舒适度、自理能力、心理支持、情绪状态评分及总分较舒芬太尼组均更高(P<0.05);艾司氯胺酮组术后48 h内有效PCIA按压次数及补救镇痛率(12.20%)与舒芬太尼组(17.07%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);艾司氯胺酮组总不良反应发生率40.24%低于舒芬太尼组的80.49%(P<0.05).结论 在二次剖宫产术后PCIA中应用艾司氯胺酮及舒芬太尼均可获得较好的镇痛镇静效果,但相较于应用舒芬太尼,应用艾司氯胺酮可使产妇得到更好地术后恢复,且总不良反应发生率更低.
Study on effect of esketamine on self-controlled intravenous analgesia and recovery quality after secondary cesarean section
Objective To analyze the effects of esketamine on the efficacy and recovery quality of patient controlled intrave-nous analgesia(PCIA)after secondary cesarean section.Methods A total of 164 puerperae who underwent a second cesarean section under epidural anesthesia in Zhengzhou Jinshui District General Hospital from February 2021 to December 2022 were selected,and the patients were divided into two groups by random number table method:esketamine group and sufentanil group group,with 82 cases in each group.The esketamine group received PCIA with esketamine+tropisetron+ketorolac tromethamine,while the sufentanil group received postoperative sufentanil+tropisetron+ketorolac tromethamine,alcohol for PCIA.The incision visual analog pain score and Ramasy sedation score at 2,6,12,24,and 48 hours after operation,the early postoperative recovery,the number of effective PCIA compressions and the rescue analgesia rate within 48 hours after op-eration were compared between the two groups.The occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment in the two groups was ob-served and recorded.Results At 2,6,12,24,and 48 hours after operation,the incision VAS score and Ramasy sedation score in the two groups increased first and then decreased(P<0.05),and there were differences in the incision VAS score and Ramasy sedation score between the two groups at different time points,but no statistical significance(P>0.05).The scores of emotional state,psychological support,self-care ability,physical comfort and total score of the 40-item Quality of Recovery Scale(QoR40)scores in the esketamine group at 24 h and 48 h after operation were higher than those of group sufentanil(P<0.05).There was no difference significant between the esketamine group and the sufentanil group(17.07%)in the number of effective PCIA compressions and rescue analgesia rate within 48 hours after operation(P>0.05).The inci-dence of adverse reactions in esketamine group was 40.24%lower than that of Sufentanil group(80.49%)(P<0.05).Conclusion Bothesketamine and sufentanil can achieve better analgesic and sedative effects in PCIA after secondary cesare-an section,but compared with sufentanil,esketamine can make puerpera better postoperative recovery,and the incidence of nausea,vomiting and pruritus is lower.

Second cesarean sectionPatient controlled intravenous analgesiaEsketamineSufentanil

冯炎超、常超男、李彬

展开 >

郑州市金水区总医院麻醉科,郑州 450000

郑州大学第二附属医院,郑州 450000

二次剖宫产 静脉自控镇痛 艾司氯胺酮 舒芬太尼

2024

医药论坛杂志
中华预防医学会,河南省医学情报研究所

医药论坛杂志

影响因子:0.47
ISSN:1672-3422
年,卷(期):2024.45(11)