首页|糖尿病神经病变不同神经纤维损伤的机制研究

糖尿病神经病变不同神经纤维损伤的机制研究

扫码查看
目的 研究2型糖尿病患者超敏C反应蛋白(hypersensitive C-reactive protein,hs-CRP)与周围神经病变不同神经纤维损伤的关系。方法 选择2020年3月至2021年12月在郑州大学第一附属医院内分泌科住院治疗的2型糖尿病患者238例。根据临床表现及定量感觉检查结果将患者分为4组,无周围神经病变组(60例)、粗有髓鞘神经纤维病变组(粗髓组,60例)、细有髓鞘神经纤维病变组(细髓组,59例)和无髓鞘神经纤维病变组(无髓组,59例)。获取所有患者性别、年龄、病史、血压、体质指数、糖尿病病程及血生化检测值;测定各组患者hs-CRP水平和电流感觉阈值(current perception threshold,CPT),并分析其上述指标与不同种类神经病变的相关性。然后基于抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression Scale,SDS)和焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)对所有研究对象进行评估。结果 hs-CRP分别为:粗髓组(5。76±5。21)mg/L,细髓组(4。07±3。77)mg/L,无髓组(3。83±3。49)mg/L,无神经病变组(2。75±2。34)mg/L;粗髓组 hs-CRP明显高于细髓组、无髓组、无神经病变组(P<0。05)。各组电流感觉阈值(CPT)分别为:粗髓组20。16±6。64,细髓组16。78±4。66,无髓组(17。02±4。61,无神经病变组9。19±1。85),神经病变组患者明显高于无神经病变组(P<0。05);神经病变各组间CPT比较均无明显差异(P>0。05)。双因素相关性分析提示,粗髓组hs-CRP与CPT具有正相关性(r值=0。885,P<0。01)。各组 SDS、SAS 分别为:粗髓组(32。8±9。4),(31。2±9。9);细髓组(43。8±8。2),(42。2±8。6);无髓组(50。6±10。8),(50。6±10。8);无神经病变组(52。3±11。5),(51。0±11。6)。结论 hs-CRP 可能在2型糖尿病周围神经病变粗有髓鞘神经纤维病变的发病机制中起作用;提示粗有髓鞘神经纤维损伤的可能与血管损害有关。
Study on mechanism of nerve fiber injury in diabetic neuropathy
Objective To explore the relationship between different nerve fiber injuries and the high sensitivity C reactive protein,to identify the type of nerve fiber injuries in patients with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropath by the sensory nerve quantitative detector.Methods The study enrolled 246 participants with type 2 diabetes admitted in Endocrine Depart-ment of The Second Artillery General Hospital PLA from March,2020 to December,2021.The participants were divided in-to 4 groups according to their medical history,clinical symptoms,signs and the performance of diabetic peripheral neuropa-thy,combined with the quantitative sensory detector test results.The patients were divided into Group without peripheral neuropathy(60 cases),Group with coarse myelinated nerve fibers lesion(60 cases),Group with fine myelinated nerve fi-bers lesion(59 cases)and Group without myelinated nerve fibers lesion(59 cases).All of the patients'gender,age,blood pressure,body mass index(BMI),duration of diabetes and blood biochemical values were obtained.The changes of high sensitivity C reactive protein were observed between groups.And the analysis of variance and multiple x2test were adopted for the comparison between groups.Then,all subjects were evaluated based on Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS)and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS).Results hs-CRP was(5.76±5.21)mg/L in crude pulp group,(4.07±3.77)mg/L in fine pulp group,(3.83±3.49)mg/L in non-pulp group and(2.75±2.34)mg/L in non-neuropathy group,respectively.hs-CRP in coarse pulp group was significantly higher than that in fine pulp group,no pulp group and no neuropathy group(P<0.05).The CPT of each group was(20.16±6.64)in the coarse pulp group,(16.78±4.66)in the fine pulp group,(17.02±4.61)in the non-pulp group,and(9.19±1.85)in the non-neuropathy group,which was significantly higher in the neuropathy group than in the non-neuropathy group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in CPT among neuropathy groups(P>0.05).Two-factor correlation analysis indicated that hs-CRP was positively correlated with CPT in the crude pulp group(r value=0.885,P<0.01).SDS and SAS in the crude pulp group were(32.8±9.4)and(31.2±9.9),respectively.Fine pulp group(43.8±8.2),(42.2±8.6);No pulp group(50.6±10.8),(50.6±10.8);without neuropathy group(52.3±11.5),(51.0±11.6).Conclusion hs-CRP may play a role in the pathogenesis of coarse myelinated nerve fibers lesions.The peripheral neuropathy of coarse myelinated nerve fiber damage in type 2 diabetic may be associated with vascular injuries.

Type2 diabetes mellitusDiabetic perpheral neuropathyDifferent nerve fiber injuriesHigh sensitivity c-re-active proteinSensory quantitative test

袁方圆、王慧丽、岳媛媛、莫莉、孙蔚

展开 >

郑州大学第一附属医院AICU,郑州 450000

郑州大学第一附属医院老年内分泌科,郑州 450000

北京空港医院内分泌科,北京 100000

郑州大学第一附属医院手术部,郑州 450000

展开 >

2型糖尿病 糖尿病周围神经病变 不同神经纤维损伤 超敏C反应蛋白 感觉定量检测

2024

医药论坛杂志
中华预防医学会,河南省医学情报研究所

医药论坛杂志

影响因子:0.47
ISSN:1672-3422
年,卷(期):2024.45(13)
  • 8