首页|脑静脉回流障碍与脑梗死治疗预后的相关性分析

脑静脉回流障碍与脑梗死治疗预后的相关性分析

扫码查看
目的 分析脑静脉回流障碍与脑梗死(cerebral infarct,CI)治疗预后的相关性。方法 纳入濮阳市人民医院2021年7月至2022年8月期间收治的138例CI患者为观察对象,均行局部静脉窦溶栓治疗,3个月随访时根据改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分将患者分为预后不良组(67例)与预后良好组(71例),比较两组患者的基础资料、脑静脉回流情况、预后情况,溶栓治疗预后的影响因素分析采用单因素、多因素回归分析,相关性采用Spearman相关性分析。结果 预后不良组CVCS分级、血管再通率低于预后良好组,而年龄、脑组织含水率、累及脑深部静脉患者比例、出血性脑梗死患者比例、NIHSS评分均高于预后良好组(P<0。05)。经多因素回归分析显示,CVCS分级、NIHSS评分、血管再通率是影响溶栓治疗预后的独立危险因素。患者溶栓治疗后的mRS评分、血管再通率在脑静脉侧支不同CVCS分级中差异比较有统计学意义(P<0。05);且经Spearman相关性分析显示,CVCS分级与治疗后血管再通率呈正相关,与mRS评分呈负相关(r=4。683、-0。574,均P<0。001)。结论 CVCS分级、NIHSS评分、血管再通率是影响溶栓治疗预后的独立危险因素。CVCS分级有助于判断CI溶栓治疗预后情况,CVCS分级越低,血管再通率越低,mRS评分越高,预后效果越差。
Correlation analysis of cerebral venous reflux disorder and prognosis of cerebral infarction treatment
Objective To analyze the correlation between cerebral venous reflux disorder and the prognosis of cerebral infarction(CI).Methods A total of 138 CI patients admitted to our hospital from July 2021 to August 2022 were en-rolled in the study.All patients were treated with local venous sinus thrombolysis.At 3 months of follow-up,the pa-tients were divided into poor prognosis group(67 cases)and good prognosis group(71 cases)according to the modified Rankin scale(mRS)score.The basic data,cerebral venous reflux and prognosis of the two groups were compared.Uni-variate and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors of prognosis of thrombolytic thera-py,and Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation.Results The CVCS grade and vascular reca-nalization rate in the poor prognosis group were lower than those in the good prognosis group,while the age,brain tissue water content,proportion of patients with deep cerebral vein involvement,proportion of patients with hemorrhagic cere-bral infarction and NIHSS score were higher than those in the good prognosis group(P<0.05).Multivariate regression analysis showed that CVCS grade,NIHSS score and vascular recanalization rate were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of thrombolytic therapy.There were significant differences in mRS score and vascular recanalization rate between different CVCS grades of cerebral venous collaterals after thrombolytic therapy(P<0.05).Spearman correlation analysis showed that CVCS grade was positively correlated with vascular recanalization rate after treatment,and negative-ly correlated with mRS score(r=4.683,-0.574,all P<0.001).Conclusion CVCS grade,NIHSS score and vas-cular recanalization rate are independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of thrombolytic therapy.CVCS classification is helpful to judge the prognosis of CI thrombolytic therapy.The lower the CVCS classification,the lower the vascular re-canalization rate,the higher the mRS score,and the worse the prognosis.

Cerebral infarctionIntravenous thrombolytic therapyCerebral venous collateral circulationmRS scorenHISS scoreVascular recanalization ratePrognosis

刘素梅、张盼盼、朱亚飞、朱明振、刘远洪、张圣楠

展开 >

濮阳市人民医院神经内三科,河南濮阳 457000

脑梗死 静脉溶栓治疗 脑静脉侧支循环 mRS评分 NHISS评分 血管再通率 预后

2024

医药论坛杂志
中华预防医学会,河南省医学情报研究所

医药论坛杂志

影响因子:0.47
ISSN:1672-3422
年,卷(期):2024.45(24)