首页|论全国人大授权其常委会制定法律的基础和界限

论全国人大授权其常委会制定法律的基础和界限

扫码查看
2023年《立法法》修改新增规定,全国人大可以授权全国人大常委会制定相关法律。这是对实践中两机关协作立法经验的制度化。全国人大在历史上有过三种情形的授权先例,但存在规范依据不明确与授权形态不一致等情况。授权制定法律具有宪制结构层面的原因,授权的规范依据在于《宪法》第67条第22项。授权不能突破宪法在全国人大及其常委会之间设置的对立法权的绝对保留,全国人大必须就相关立法事项作出重大宪制决定。全国人大授权其常委会制定法律可实现民主与效能之间的再平衡,试验型授权与执行型授权是更可取的制度形态。应进一步提高授权的规范化水平,推进全国人大及其常委会在国家治理体系中发挥更大作用。
The Basis and Limit of the Power of the National People's Congress to Authorize its Standing Committee to Enact Laws
The Chinese Legislation Law,which was amended in 2023,provides that the National People's Congress(NPC)may authorize its Standing Committee(NPCSC)to en-act laws.This is the institutionalization of the existing experience of legislative collaboration be-tween the two organs.The NPC made such authorizations in the 1950s,the 1980s,and the 2020s,but there were ambiguities,such as unclear normative basis and inconsistent forms of authorization,in practice.In terms of the basis of authorization,the NPC has cited the miscel-laneous provision on its own powers,the miscellaneous provision on the powers of the NPCSC and other provisions in the Constitution for the authorization,but its practice is not consistent and sometimes it failed to specify the basis.In terms of the form of authorization,the NPC sometimes made special decisions on the authorization and sometimes gave the authorization in the decision on the work report of the NPCSC.In terms of the content of authorization,the NPC has authorized the NPCSC to formulate and amend laws in a general way and also specifically authorized the NPCSC to formulate,amend or implement on a trial basis of specific laws or draft laws.The reason why the authorization can appear repeatedly across different historical periods is because of its constitutional structure,at the core of which is the tension between the legisla-tive resource of the NPC and the need for legislation.The constitutional status of the NPCSC al-so determines its suitability to accept the authorization by the NPC.The normative basis for the authorization lies in the miscellaneous provision on the powers of NPCSC[Article 67(22)of the Constitution],which provides that the NPCSC can exercise other functions and powers ac-corded to it by the NPC.The NPC cannot rely on the miscellaneous provision on its own func-tions and powers[Article 62(16)of the Constitution]or the provision on its own legislative power[Article 62(3)of the Constitution]to make the authorization.The authorization must be kept within constitutional boundaries and may not undermine the constitutional status of the highest organ of state power.The NPC cannot break through the absolute reservation of legisla-tive power set by the Constitution between the NPC and the NPCSC.Therefore,it can authorize the NPCSC to formulate relevant laws on matters involving basic laws,but must make core polit-ical decisions on such matters on its own.The NPC's authorization will contribute to the rebal-ance between democracy and effectiveness.Experimental authorization and executive authoriza-tion are desirable institutional forms of authorization.China should further standardize the au-thorization between the NPC and the NPCSC,so as to enable the NPCSC to play a greater role in the state governance system.

钱坤

展开 >

北京大学法学院

国家立法权 全国人大 全国人大常委会 基本法律 授权立法

2023年度"国家资助博士后研究人员计划"课题

GZB20230010

2024

环球法律评论
中国社会科学院法学研究所

环球法律评论

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.188
ISSN:1009-6728
年,卷(期):2024.46(2)
  • 65