首页|我国侵权法上"相应的责任"的体系解释

我国侵权法上"相应的责任"的体系解释

扫码查看
《民法典》第1169条第2款、第1189条、第1191条第2款、第1193条以及第1256条规定的"相应的责任",是指侵权人向被侵权人直接承担的与其过错程度、原因力大小相适应的侵权责任,并非是各个侵权人之间的内部责任的分摊.承担相应的责任的侵权人与其他侵权人因为他们各自实施的侵权行为,而就被侵权人遭受的同一损害各自独立地承担赔偿责任.由于各个侵权人的赔偿范围存在差异,为了能够实现完全赔偿的原则,又不违反禁止得利的原则,故此他们之间构成部分的连带责任.对于被侵权人而言,其获得的赔偿不能超过应受赔偿的范围,故此,被侵权人可以在各个侵权人的赔偿范围相互重合的部分请求他们承担连带责任,但是,就超过该重合范围的损害部分则只能请求承担全部赔偿义务的侵权人继续承担赔偿责任.承担相应的责任的侵权人与其他侵权人之间能否追偿,不能一概而论,应区分不同的侵权行为以及侵权人之间的法律关系和侵权责任的性质分别判断.
Systematic Interpretation of the"Corresponding Lability"in the Chinese Tort Liability Law
The"corresponding liability"stipulated in Article 1169(2),Article 1189,Article 1191(2),Article 1193,and Article 1256 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China(CCC)is controversial in nature and form.It is a tort compensation liability directly borne by the tortfeasor to the victim that corresponds to the degree of the fault and the magnitude of the causative force.It is not the breach of contract liability between the responsible party and other tortfeasors with whom he has a contractual relationship.The form of tort liability between the tortfeasor who bears the corresponding liability and that of other tortfeasors is"partial joint and several liability",rather than joint and several liability,supplementary liability,non-genu-ine joint and several liability,or any other form of liability.Specifically,guardians and trustees at fault,instigators and helpers and guardians who have failed to fulfill their guardianship du-ties,employing units of labor dispatched workers and labor dispatch units at fault,as well as contractors and principals at fault,those who pile,dump,or scatter objects that obstruct pas-sage on public roads and the managers of public roads who cannot prove that they are not at fault all bear tort compensation liability for their respective tortious acts to the victim for the same damage.Since the scopes of the tort compensation liability of these tortfeasors do not coincide completely,their tort compensation liabilities do not constitute a joint and several liability for the entire scope of compensation but rather form a joint and several liability within the scope where they overlap.It is believed that partial joint and several liability is conducive to imple-menting the principles of full compensation and the prohibition of unjust enrichment,thus better protecting the victim.At the same time,from the perspective of causation,the corresponding li-ability should also be considered as forming a relationship of partial joint and several liability with the tort liability borne by other tortfeasors.In addition,partial joint and several liability has already been provided for in Article 1195(2)of CCC and Article 7 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Environmental Tort Liability Dispute Cases and other laws and judicial interpretations,and in judicial practice,the proportional joint and several liability that courts impose on intermediary institutions in disputes over false statements in the securities market is also a form of partial joint and several liability.As for whether the tortfeasor who bears the corresponding liability can seek recourse from other tortfeasors,it cannot be generalized and should be judged separately accord-ing to different tortious acts and the legal relationship between the tortfeasors and the nature of the tort liability.

程啸

展开 >

清华大学法学院

民法典 侵权法 相应的责任 部分的连带责任 追偿

国家社会科学基金重大项目(2023)

23&ZD155

2024

环球法律评论
中国社会科学院法学研究所

环球法律评论

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.188
ISSN:1009-6728
年,卷(期):2024.46(3)
  • 1
  • 4