首页|心脏康复推荐量表的汉化及信效度检验

心脏康复推荐量表的汉化及信效度检验

扫码查看
目的 汉化心脏康复(cardiac rehabilitation,CR)推荐量表(recommending cardiac rehabilitation scale,ReCaRe)并检验其信度和效度。方法 在获得源量表作者授权后,通过Brislin翻译模型汉化ReCaRe,经过专家文化调试,选取80名医护人员进行预实验,综合后形成中文版ReCaRe(C-ReCaRe)。采取目的抽样法,选取2022年10月-2023年1月18所医院280名医护人员进行调查,6周后对其中30名进行重测,收集问卷数据进行分析。结果 (1)280名医护人员同意接受调查,完成率达100%;实际回收266份有效问卷,测试有效率95%;量表的完成时间1~5 min。(2)高低2组的决断值为3。984~6。723(P<0。01);各条目得分与量表总分的相关系数r为0。523~0。706(P<0。01)。(3)总量表的Cronbach's α为0。930;总量表的折半信度为0。789,各维度的折半信度为0。806~0。905。总量表的重测信度0。901;各维度的重测信度为0。733~0。964(P<0。01);各维度得分两两之间的相关系数为0。893~0。950。(4)平均量表水平内容效度为0。945,条目水平内容效度为0。902~0。974。探索性因子分析共提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为83。940%。完全标准化的因子载荷值0。751~0。936(P<0。01);组合信度CR为0。865~0。924;平均方差抽取量AVE为0。633~0。763;每个因子的相关系数值为0。482~0。677。结论 C-ReCaRe量表具有良好的信效度,可作为评价中国医护人员对CR推荐度的有效测量工具。
Construction of the Chinese version of recommending cardiac rehabilitation scale and its test of reliability and validity
Objective To translate the English version of recommending cardiac rehabilitation(CR)scale(Re-CaRe)into Chinese,and to test its reliability and validity.Method After obtaining authorization from the auther of the original scale,ReCaRe was Chineseized through the Brislin translation model.After expert cultural adjustment,80 medical professionals'were selected for pre-experiment,and the Chinese version of ReCaRe(C-ReCaRe)was formed after synthesis.Purpose sampling method was adopted to select 280 medical professionals'from 18 hospitals from October 2022 to January 2023 for investigation.After 6 weeks,30 of them were retested and the questionnaire data was collected for analysis.Results(1)A total of 280 medical professionals'agreed to accept the survey,with the completion rate of 100%;Actually,266 valid questionnaires were collected,and the test efficiency was 95%;The completion time of the scale was 1-5 min.(2)The decision value of the high and low groups was 3.984-6.723(P<0.01);The correlation coefficient r between each item score and the total score of the scale was 0.523-0.706(P<0.01).(3)The Cronbach's of the total scale was 0.930,the half-reliability of the total scale was 0.789,and the half-reliability of each dimension was 0.806-0.905;The test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.901;The test-retest reliability of each dimension was 0.733-0.964(P<0.01);The correlation coefficient between the scores of each dimension was 0.893-0.950.(4)The content validity of the average scale level was 0.945,and the content validity of item level was 0.902-0.974;Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 83.940%,and fully standardized factor loading values was 0.751-0.936(P<0.01);The combined reliability CR was 0.865-0.924;The average variance extraction was AVE 0.633-0.763;The correlation coefficient of each factor was 0.482-0.677.Conclusions C-ReCaRe has good reliability and validity,which can be used as an effective measurement tool for evaluating the recommendation of Chinese medical profession-als'for cardiac rehabilitation.

cardiac rehabilitationmedical professionalsrecommendingreliabilityvalidity

郭慧琦、沈蕴之、孙笑天

展开 >

复旦大学附属华山医院心脏科,上海 200040

心脏康复 医护人员 推荐 信度 效度

复旦大学复星护理科研项目

FNF202069

2024

护士进修杂志
贵州省医药卫生学会办公室

护士进修杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:2.59
ISSN:1002-6975
年,卷(期):2024.39(9)
  • 19