首页|全膝关节置换术患者恐动症水平变化轨迹及影响因素分析

全膝关节置换术患者恐动症水平变化轨迹及影响因素分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TK A)恐动症水平变化轨迹及其影响因素.方法 采用便利抽样法选取2021年10月-2022年6月我院收治的TKA患者为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、恐动症评估简表、疼痛灾难化量表、社会支持量表、一般自我效能感量表进行调查,分别在出院前1 d(T1)、出院后1个月(T2)、出院后3个月(T3)、出院后6个月(T4)评估患者恐动症程度,采用潜变量增长模型识别恐动症变化轨迹的潜在类别,并通过logistic回归分析其影响因素.结果 参与调查的271例TKA患者恐动症在出院后半年内呈下降趋势;恐动症变化轨迹可分为高恐动症下降组(C1组,34%)、中等恐动症下降组(C2组,28%)、无恐动症组(C3组,38%).logistic回归分析结果显示,以无恐动症组为参照变量,年龄≥60~<70岁(OR=2.715,P=0.021,95%CI:1.161~6.351)及 ≥70 岁(OR=3.136,P=0.011,95%CI:1.306~7.530)、高合并症(OR=2.275,P=0.012,95%CI:1.199~4.318)、高疼痛灾难化水平(OR=3.434,P<0.001,95%CI:1.757~6.711)、低社会支持水平(OR=3.378,P=0.003,95%CI:1.494~7.634)的患者更易进入 C1 组,而年龄≥60~<70 岁(OR=3.626,P=0.008,95%CJ:1.390~9.460)及 ≥70 岁(OR=3.669,P=0.006,95%CI:1.449~9.291)、低社会支持(OR=3.378,P=0.003,95%CJ:1.494~7.634)、高自我效能感(OR=3.606,P=0.009,95%CI:1.378~9.439)的患者更易进入C2组;以C2为参照变量,高合并症(OR=2.643,P=0.005,95%CI:1.348~5.183)的患者易进入C3组.结论 TKA患者恐动症轨迹存在3种不同的变化轨迹,护士应重视年龄大、合并症多、疼痛灾难化水平高的患者,可通过提供适当的社会支持,增强患者自我效能感方式改善术后恐动症.
Change trajectory and influencing factors of kinesiophobia level in patients with total knee arthroplasty
Objective To explore the trajectory of kinesiophobia and its influencing factors in total knee arthro-plasty(TKA),and to provide reference for the early development of targeted interventions after surgery.Methods Convenience sampling method was used to select TKA patients admitted to our hospital from October 2021 to June 2022 as the research objects.The general information questionnaire,Kinesiophobia Assessment Scale,Pain Cata-strophizing Scale,Social Support Scal,and General Self-Efficacy Scale were used for investigation.The degree of patients with kinesiophobia was evaluated at 1 day before discharge(T1),1 month after discharge(T2),3 months after discharge(T3),and 6 months after discharge(T4),respectively.The latent variable growth model was used to identify the potential categories of change trajectory of kinesiophobia,and the influencing factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.Results The level of kinesiophobia in 271 TKA patients showed a downward trend within half a year after discharge.The trajectory of kinesiophobia could be divided into high kinesiophobia decline group(34%,C1 group),moderate kinesiophobia decline group(28%,C2 group),and no kinesiophobia group(38%,C3 group).The results of logistic regression analysis showed that,with the no kinesiophobia group as the reference variable,patients aged 60-70(OR=2.715,P=0.021,95%CI was 1.161-6.351)and 70 and above(OR=3.136,P=0.011,95%CI was 1.306-7.530),with high comorbidities(OR=2.275,P=0.012,95%CI was 1.199-4.318),high pain catastrophizing level(OR=3.434,P<0.001,95%CI was 1.757-6.711),and low social support level(OR=3.378,P=0.003,95%CI was 1.494-7.634)were more likely to enter the C1 group,while patients aged 60-70(OR=3.626,P=0.008,95%CI was 1.390-9.460)and 70 and above(OR=3.669,P=0.006,95%CI was 1.449-9.291),with low social support(OR=3.378,P=0.003,95%CI was 1.494-7.634)and high self-efficacy(OR=3.606,P=0.009,95%CI was 1.378-9.439)were more likely to enter the C2 group.With the C3 group as the reference variable,patients with high comorbidities(OR=2.643,P=0.005,95%CI was 1.348-5.183)were more likely to enter the C3 group(all P<0.05).Conclusion There are 3 different traj-ectories of kinesiophobia in TKA patients.Nurses should pay attention to patients with older age,more complica-tions,and higher levels of pain catastrophization,and improve postoperative kinesiophobia by providing appropriate social support and enhancing patients'sense of self-efficacy.

total knee arthroplastykinesiophobiarisk factorstrajectory

张莉、张子茹、张彩蕾、付俊

展开 >

空军军医大学第二附属医院唐都医院,陕西西安 710038

全膝关节置换术 恐动症 危险因素 轨迹

2024

护士进修杂志
贵州省医药卫生学会办公室

护士进修杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:2.59
ISSN:1002-6975
年,卷(期):2024.39(9)
  • 31