摘要
对老子与亚里士多德生态哲学观的比较,旨在指出二人在该思想方面的同异之处.其相同之处在于同基于人类与自然如何相处的视角对秉承何种生态观做了研究分析.比如皆主张不悖、不掠自然以及节欲保天的生态观念.但在看待人类与自然的关系上,二人出发点不同:老子基于人类与自然为一的出发点,由此倡导物我一体、命运与共,认为爱护宇宙万物就是爱人类自身;亚里士多德则基于人类与自然相对的出发点,由此在关于自然生态的理论上难免渗透功利主义色彩,而人类是为了自身更好的生存和发展才爱护宇宙万物.在比较分析老子与亚里士多德生态哲学思想基础上,运用双重继承法挖掘二人关于生态哲学思想方面的价值.
Abstract
A comparison of the ecological philosophical views of Laozi and Aristotle aims to point out the similarities and differences in this aspect between Laozi and Aristotle.The similarity in their thinking lies in their research and analysis of what ecological views they adhere to,based on the perspective of how humans and nature coexist.For example,it advocates that peo-ple should respect and conform to nature,limit reasonable desires to protect nature,and so on.However,when it comes to the re-lationship between humans and nature,the two have different starting points:Laozi,based on the unity of humans and nature,ad-vocates for the unity of things and oneself,and the unity of destiny,believing that caring for all things in the universe is loving oneself;Aristotle,on the other hand,based on the opposition between humans and nature,inevitably infused utilitarianism into his theory of natural ecology.Humans protect all things in the universe for their better survival and development.
基金项目
河南兴文化工程文化研究专项重大招标项目(023XWH004)
河南省哲学社会科学规划年度项目(2022CLS017)
国家社科基金项目(20XZX020)
维普
万方数据