首页|3种口内扫描仪用于咬合关系记录的准确度研究

3种口内扫描仪用于咬合关系记录的准确度研究

扫码查看
目的 探究3种口内扫描仪用于获取最大牙尖交错位(MIP)咬合关系的准确度,为临床实践提供参考.方法 招募10名上下颌牙列完整、咬合关系正常的受试者.对照组采用面弓转移和咬合记录将位于MIP的上下颌石膏模型固定在?架上,并使用桌面扫描仪对固定的模型进行扫描以获得数字化模型数据;实验组分别使用Trios 3、Carestream 3600以及Aoralscan 3口内扫描仪对受试者进行口内扫描以获取位于MIP时上下颌口扫模型数据.在对照组数字化模型的上下颌双侧中切牙、尖牙和第一磨牙上设置测量点并测量上下颌对应同名牙上测量点之间的距离,获得测量的距离之和DA,同时计算模型中切牙区、尖牙区以及第一磨牙区的测量点间距离之和,分别记为DI、DC、DM.将添加测量点的对照组上下颌模型分别与实验组上下颌口扫模型进行精确匹配,计算匹配后对照组模型的DA、DI、DC和DM.对对照组和实验组获得的DA、DI、DC、DM进行统计学分析,以评估3种口内扫描仪记录咬合关系的准确度.结果 对照组DA、DI、DC、DM的值分别为(39.58±6.40)、(13.64±3.58)、(14.91±2.85)、(11.03±1.56)mm,Trios 3组相应的值为(38.99±6.60)、(13.42±3.66)、(14.55±2.87)、(11.03±1.69)mm,Carestream 3600组相应的值为(38.57±6.36)、(13.56±3.68)、(14.45±2.85)、(10.55±1.41)mm,Aoralscan 3组相应的值为(38.16±5.69)、(13.03±3.54)、(14.23±2.59)、(10.90±1.54)mm.方差分析显示无论是整体偏差DA(P=0.96),还是局部偏差DI(P=0.98)、DC(P=0.96)、DM(P=0.89),3种口内扫描仪获取的数字化模型与对照组模型之间差异均无统计学意义.结论 在规范的操作流程下,3种口内扫描仪获取的MIP咬合关系与传统方法无差异,满足临床诊疗的需求.
Trueness evaluation of three intraoral scanners for the recording of maximal intercuspal position
Objective This clinical study aimed to as-sess the trueness of three intraoral scanners for the recor-ding of the maximal intercuspal position(MIP)to provide a reference for clinical practice.Methods Ten participants with good occlusal relationship and healthy temporomandibular joint were recruited.For the control group,facebow transferring procedures were performed,and bite registrations at the MIP were used to transfer maxillary and mandibular casts to a mechanical articulator,which were then scanned with a laboratory scanner to obtain digital cast data.For the experimental groups,three intraoral scanners(Trios 3,Carestream 3600,and Aoralscan 3)were used to obtain digital casts of the participants at the MIP following the scanning workflows endorsed by the corresponding manufacturers.Sub-sequently,measurement points were marked on the control group's digital casts at the central incisors,canines,and first molars,and corresponding distances between these points on the maxillary and mandibular casts were measured to calcu-late the sum of measured distances(DA).Distances between measurement points in the incisor(DI),canine(DC),and first molar(DM)regions were also calculated.The control group's maxillary and mandibular digital casts with the added mea-surement points were aligned with the experimental group's casts,and DA,DI,DC,and DM values of the aligned control casts were determined.Statistical analysis was performed on DA,DI,DC,and DM obtained from both the control and ex-perimental groups to evaluate the trueness of the three intraoral scanners for the recording of MIP.Results In the con-trol group,DA,DI,DC,and DM values were(39.58±6.40),(13.64±3.58),(14.91±2.85),and(11.03±1.56)mm.The Trios 3 group had values of(38.99±6.60),(13.42±3.66),(14.55±2.87),and(11.03±1.69)mm.The Carestream 3600 group showed values of(38.57±6.36),(13.56±3.68),(14.45±2.85),and(10.55±1.41)mm,while the Aoralscan 3 group had val-ues of(38.16±5.69),(13.03±3.54),(14.23±2.59),and(10.90±1.54)mm.Analysis of variance revealed no statistically sig-nificant differences between the experimental and control groups for overall deviation DA(P=0.96),as well as local devi-ations DI(P=0.98),DC(P=0.96),and DM(P=0.89).Conclusion With standardized scanning protocols,the three intra-oral scanners demonstrated comparable trueness to traditional methods in recording MIP,fulfilling clinical requirements.

intraoral scannermaximal intercuspal positionocclusal relationshipdigital dentistry

王思谕、周哲青、袁泉、岳莉、杨胜涛

展开 >

口腔疾病防治全国重点实验室 国家口腔医学中心 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院口腔修复工艺科,成都 610041

口腔疾病防治全国重点实验室 国家口腔医学中心 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院口腔种植科,成都 610041

口内扫描仪 最大牙尖交错位 咬合关系 数字化牙科

四川大学国家级大学生创新创业训练计划四川大学高等教育教学改革工程研究项目

2-02310610205SCU-10374

2024

华西口腔医学杂志
四川大学

华西口腔医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.336
ISSN:1000-1182
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 28