首页|子午线弧长正反解表达式3种形式的解析

子午线弧长正反解表达式3种形式的解析

扫码查看
为了分析不同表达式在计算效率方面的影响,给出了子午线弧长的3种表达形式,将其展开系数改写为第三扁率n的表达形式,并对不同形式的子午线弧长的截断误差进行计算分析,选取合适的项数,给出展开式的实用公式.结果表明,基于n表示的子午线弧长,其系数在分数形式上看起来位数更少,形式更简单,更便于推广使用;当正解精度为毫米时,展开式只需保留前4项即可满足精度,当反解精度为0.000 1"时,展开式只需保留前4项即可满足精度;对于3种表达形式,二倍角形式计算效率最高,因此建议在子午线弧长正反解过程中采用二倍角形式.
Analysis of three forms of direct and inverse expressions of meridian arc length
In order to analyze the influence of different expressions on the computational efficiency,three expressions of the meridian arc length are given in this paper.The expansion coefficients are rewritten as the third flattening n.The truncation errors of different forms of meridian arc length are calculated and analyzed,the appropriate terms are selected and the practical formulas of the expansion are given.The results show that the coefficients in the direct and inverse of the meridian arc length based on n have fewer digits in the numerical value,more concise form,and are more convenient for popularization and application.When the accuracy of the direct expression is millimeter,the expansion only needs to keep the first four items.When the inverse solution accuracy is 0.000 1",the expansion only needs to keep the first four items to satisfy the accuracy.For the three expressions,the double-angle form has higher computational efficiency.Therefore,it is recommended to use the double-angle form in the process of the positive and negative solutions of the meridian arc length.

geodetic surveyingmeridian arc lengththe third flatteningtruncation errorthree expressions

张晓平、焦晨晨、李厚朴、边少锋、张思远

展开 >

中国地质大学(北京)信息网络中心,北京 100083

武汉大学图像传播与印刷包装研究中心,湖北武汉 430070

中国地质大学(武汉)地理与信息工程学院,湖北武汉 430074

海军工程大学导航工程系,湖北武汉 430033

中国地质大学(武汉)地质探测与评估教育部重点实验室,湖北武汉 430074

展开 >

大地测量 子午线弧长 第三扁率 截断误差 3种表达式

国家优秀青年科学基金国家自然科学基金国家自然科学基金中国地质大学(北京)学科发展研究基金

4212202541971416420740102022XK207

2023

海洋测绘
海军海洋测绘研究所

海洋测绘

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.669
ISSN:1671-3044
年,卷(期):2023.43(6)
  • 9