首页|中国老年人随诊间收缩压变异性和全因死亡风险的关系——一项回顾性队列研究

中国老年人随诊间收缩压变异性和全因死亡风险的关系——一项回顾性队列研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨中国老年人随诊间收缩压变异性(systolic blood pressure variability,SBPV)和全因死亡风险的关系.方法 基于2008-2018年中国纵向健康长寿调查(Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey,CLHLS)的跟踪数据集,选取≥65岁、有连续3次收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)记录且随访至2018年的老年人作为研究对象.采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析老年人随诊间SBPV与全因死亡风险的关系;按性别、年龄亚组分析以评估随诊间SBPV的交互作用;最后,在模型中加入限制性立方样条(restricted cubic spline,RCS)探究两者的剂量-反应关系.结果 (1)共纳入2 582名老年人,平均年龄为78(71,86)岁,其中男性1 253人(48.5%).在平均3.29年的随访期间,共有739例(28.6%)老年人死亡;(2)校正相关混杂因素后,随诊间SBPV与全因死亡风险之间呈正相关,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(3)亚组分析显示:性别、年龄对不同随诊间SBPV水平与全因死亡风险的关联未发现效应修饰作用(P交互作用≥0.100);(4)RCS结果显示,随诊间SBPV与全因死亡风险之间的剂量-反应关系在男性和女性中一致,全因死亡风险随随诊间SBPV增大而线性升高(P总趋势SBPV<0.001,P非线性SBPV>0.05).在不同年龄分组中,<70岁组的随诊间SBPV与全因死亡风险呈正线性关系,而其余年龄组两者均无剂量-反应关系(年龄<70岁组:P总趋势SBPV<0.001,P非线性SBPV>0.05;其余年龄组:P总趋势SBPV>0.05,P非线性SBPV>0.05).结论 中国老年人随诊间SBPV与全因死亡风险相关,其独立于随访期间平均SBP.除了检测老年人群的SBP外,还应关注其就诊以来SBP的波动情况.
Relationship between follow-up systolic blood pressure variability and the risk of all-cause mortality in Chinese elderly:a retrospective cohort study
Objective To investigate the relationship between follow-up systolic blood pressure variability(SBPV)and the risk of all-cause mortality in older adults across China.Methods Based on the follow-up dataset of the 2008-2018 China longitudinal healthy longevity survey(CLHLS),older adults aged 65 years or older with three consecutive times of recorded systolic blood pressure(SBP)and followed up until 2018 were selected as study subjects.A Cox regression analysis model was used to analyze the relationship between follow-up SBPV and all-cause mortality in older adults;analyses were conducted by gender and age subgroups to assess the interaction of follow-up SBPV;and finally,restricted cubic spline(RCS)was added to the model to explore the dose-response relationship between the two.Results(1)A total of 2 582 older adults were enrolled,including 1 253(48.5%)males with a median age of 78(71,86)years.A total of 739(28.6%)older adults died during a mean follow-up period of 3.29 years.(2)After correcting for relevant confounders,there was a significant positive association between follow-up SBPV and the risk of all-cause mortality(P<0.05).(3)Subgroup analyses showed no effect modification of gender and age on the association between different follow-up SBPV levels and the risk of all-cause mortality(Pinteraction≥0.100).(4)Restricted cubic spline results showed that the dose-response relationship between follow-up SBPV and the risk of all-cause mortality was consistent in both gender,with the risk of all-cause mortality increasing linearly with increasing follow-up SBPV.(Poverall SBPV<0.001,Pnon-linearity SBPV>0.05).Among the different age subgroups,follow-up SBPV was positively and linearly associated with the risk of all-cause mortality among those aged<70 years,while there was no dose-response relationship between the two in the remaining age subgroups(<70 years old:Poverall SBPV<0.001,Pnon-linearity SBPV>0.05;remaining age groups:Poverall SBPV>0.05,Pnon-linearity SBPV>0.05).Conclusions Follow-up SBPV was significantly associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in the elderly in China,which was independent of mean follow-up systolic blood pressure.In addition to detecting systolic blood pressure in the elderly population,attention should be paid to fluctuations in systolic blood pressure since the long-term visit.

Systolic blood pressure variabilityRisk of all-cause mortalityDose-response relationship

徐家豪、吴俊、尹明娟、廖绍兵、吴亮、景文苑、唐鑫明、倪进东

展开 >

广东医科大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,东莞 523808

广东医科大学顺德妇女儿童医院(佛山市顺德区妇幼保健院),佛山 528300

广东医科大学公共卫生学院精准实验室,东莞 523808

收缩压变异性 全因死亡风险 剂量-反应关系

国家自然科学基金广东省自然科学基金广东医科大学学科建设项目湛江市科技专项

822737092021A15150110384SG23001G2023B01047

2024

中华疾病控制杂志
中华预防医学会 安徽医科大学

中华疾病控制杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.862
ISSN:1674-3679
年,卷(期):2024.28(7)