首页|慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并呼吸衰竭患者无创通气中右美托咪定不同目标镇静深度效果观察

慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并呼吸衰竭患者无创通气中右美托咪定不同目标镇静深度效果观察

扫码查看
目的 观察慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)并发呼吸衰竭接受无创正压通气(NIPPV)患者采用右美托咪定镇静不同镇静深度的效果。方法 选取 2021 年 8 月~2023 年 3 月上海市宝山区罗店医院收治的AECOPD并发呼吸衰竭患者 136 例,其中对照组 40 例给予常规药物及 NIPPV治疗;镇静 A 组 48 例给予盐酸右美托咪定微量泵静脉泵入,以Ramsay镇静评分 2~3 分为目标调整剂量;镇静B组48 例盐酸右美托咪定以Ramsay镇静评分3~4 分为目标调整剂量。比较 3 组患者治疗前、治疗后 24 h的心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、平均动脉压(MAP)及动脉血气指标;比较 3 组患者NIPPV开始后 24 h内上机时间、痰液量、右美托咪定用量;比较 3 组患者插管、谵妄、心血管不良事件发生情况。结果 治疗后,3 组患者RR、MAP、HR、氧分压(PaO2)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)均较治疗前有明显改善,镇静A组、B组上述指标改善优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);镇静B组HR低于镇静A组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。镇静A组、B组上机时间长于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);镇静B组右美托咪定用量高于镇静A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);3 组痰液量差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。对照组气管插管率、谵妄发生率均高于镇静A组、B组,镇静B组心血管不良事件发生率高于对照组和镇静A组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 AECOPD患者无创通气时采用右美托咪镇静可明显改善患者依从性,降低气管插管率,减少谵妄,以Ramsay镇静评分 2~3 为目标调整剂量可降低心血管不良事件发生率。
Effects of dextrmedetomidine with different target sedation depth on non invasive ventilation in AECOPD patients with respiratory failure
Objective To observe the effect of dexmedetomidine sedation at different depths on patients with AECOPD complicated with respiratory failure undergoing non-invasive positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV).Methods From August 2021 to March 2023,136 AECOPD patients with respiratory failure were admitted.A control group of 40 patients were treated with conventional drugs and NIPPV.Sedative group A was treated with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride micro pump intravenous infusion,with a Ramsay sedation score of 2~3 points as the target adjusted dose.Sedative group B was treated with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride sedation score of 3~4 points as the target adjusted dose.The heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),mean arterial pressure(MAP)and arterial blood gas indexes of the patients in three groups before and 24 hours after treatment were compared.The time to use the machine,sputum volume,and dexmedetomidine dosage within 24 hours after the start of NIPPV in three groups were compared.The incidence of intubation,delirium and cardiovascular adverse events were compared.Results After treatment,RR,MAP,HR,PaO2 and PaCO2 in three groups of patients were significantly improved compared to before treatment.The improvement of the above indicators in the sedative A and B groups after treatment was better than in the control group,with all the differences statistically significant(P<0.05).The HR of sedative group B was lower than that of sedative group A(P<0.05).The time to use the machine in sedative group A and group B was longer than in the control group,and the dosage of dexmedetomidine in sedative group B was higher than that in sedative group A(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in sputum volume among the three groups(P>0.05).The tracheal intubation rate and delirium incidence rate in the control group were higher than those in the sedative A and B groups,and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in the sedative B group was higher than that in the control group and sedative A group(P<0.05).Conclusion The use of dexmedetomidine sedation during non-invasive ventilation in AECOPD patients can significantly improve patient compliance,reduce tracheal intubation rate,and reduce delirium.Adjusting the dosage with a Ramsay sedation score of 2-3 can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory failureNon-invasive positive pressure ventilationDexmedetomidineSedation

张龙、卢生芳、李长风、许平、陆学智、汤严严

展开 >

201908 上海市宝山区罗店医院急诊医学科

慢性阻塞性肺疾病 呼吸衰竭 无创正压通气 右美托咪定 镇静

上海市宝山区罗店医院科研项目

22-B-5

2024

中华保健医学杂志
中国人民解放军总后勤部卫生部保健局

中华保健医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.477
ISSN:1674-3245
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 18