首页|无创通气AVAPS模式对慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的治疗价值

无创通气AVAPS模式对慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的治疗价值

扫码查看
目的 分析无创机械通气平均容积保证压力支持(AVAPS)模式对慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的治疗价值。方法 选取 2021 年 1 月~2022 年 12 月在北京市房山区良乡医院呼吸科住院的 82 例慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者,随机数表法分为对照组(n=42)和观察组(n=40)。对照组采用双水平正压通气(BiPAP)S/T模式+内科治疗方案,观察组采用AVAPS模式(S/T+VT目标)+内科治疗方案。观察两组患者血气指标变化、通气效果和呼吸机相关并发症发生率。结果 对照组患者呼吸机不耐受给予内科治疗 5 例、治疗失败气管插管者 8 例;观察组 40 例,呼吸机不耐受 2 例、治疗失败气管插管者 3 例,并且插管后进呼吸重症监护室(RICU)治疗,无 1 人死亡,其余患者全都好转出院。机械通气治疗后,两组患者pH值均上升,二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)降低,与机械通气前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);观察组机械通气不同时刻pH值的上升与PaCO2 降低优于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。观察组平均潮气量(VT)(520。00±50。00)ml、每分钟静息通气量(VE)(9。77±1。30)L/min高于对照组,呼吸频率(RR)(16。00±1。00)次/min、平均漏气量(Lleak)(18。00±6。00)L/min明显低于对照组,人均呼吸机吸氧时间/日(TA)(7。35±2。44)h和人均带机时间(TB)(52。89±9。85)h高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=9。979、6。999、11。366、9。347、7。944、11。672,P<0。05)。观察组患者机械通气治疗依从性90。0%高于对照组 71。43%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4。499,P<0。05)。观察组气管插管率 7。50%、面部压伤 7。50%、胃肠胀气5。00%、吸入性肺炎 2。50%和眼结膜炎 2。50%均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 无创机械通气平均容积保证压力支持AVAPS模式减少呼吸肌做功,人机协调性好,较BiPAP显示出一定的优越性。
The therapeutic value of non-invasive ventilation with AVAPS mode in COPD patients with type Ⅱ respiratory failure
Objective This study aims to analyze the therapeutic value of non-invasive ventilation with AVAPS mode in COPD patients with type Ⅱ respiratory failure.Methods A total of 82 COPD patients with type Ⅱ respiratory failure admitted to Liangxiang hospital were included in the study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.The patients were randomly divided into two groups,the control group(n= 42)receiving BiPAP S/T mode with internal medical treatment,and the observation group(n= 40)receiving AVAPS mode(S/T + VT target)with the same internal medical treatment.The changes in arterial blood gas parameters,ventilation effectiveness,and incidence of ventilator-related complications were observed.Results In the control group,5 patients were intolerant to the ventilator,and 8 patients failed treatment and required endotracheal intubation.In the observation group,2 patients were intolerant to the ventilator,and 3 patients required endotracheal intubation.However,after intubation,the 18 patients above were transferred to the RICU and no deaths occurred.Other patients in both groups recovered and were discharged.At 6~8 hours,1 day,3 days,and 7 days of ventilator treatment,the observation group showed a better increase in pH and decrease in PaCO2 compared to the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).After mechanical ventilation,the observation group had higher ventilation parameters VT(520.00±50.00)ml and VE(9.77±1.30)L/min compared to the control group,while RR(16.00±1.00)times/min and Lleak(18.00±6.00)L/min were significantly lower in the observation group than the control group.The differences in TA(7.35±2.44)h and TB(52.89±9.85)h between the two groups were statistically significant(t=9.979,6.999,11.366,9.347,7.944,11.672,P<0.05).The compliance rate of mechanical ventilation in the observation group(90.0%)was higher than in the control group(71.43%)(χ2 = 4.499,P<0.05).The incidence of endotracheal intubation(7.50%),facial pressure sores(7.50%),and gastrointestinal distension(5.00%)in the observation group were lower than in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The occurrence of aspiration pneumonia(2.50%)and conjunctivitis(2.50%)in the observation group was lower than in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusion Non-invasive ventilation with AVAPS mode reduces the work of breathing in COPD patients with type Ⅱrespiratory failure,improves patient-ventilator synchrony,and demonstrates certain advantages compared to BiPAP mode.

Non-invasive ventilationaverage volume assured pressure support modeCOPD with type Ⅱ respiratory failureValue

张磊、乜庆荣、刘启蒙、安梦桥、骆海伦

展开 >

102401 北京市房山区良乡医院呼吸与危重症医学科

无创机械通气 AVAPS模式 慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭 价值

北京市房山区良乡医院科研项目

2020-09

2024

中华保健医学杂志
中国人民解放军总后勤部卫生部保健局

中华保健医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.477
ISSN:1674-3245
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 18