首页|阶段性心脏康复训练与传统康复训练在高血压合并急性心肌梗死患者康复效果比较分析

阶段性心脏康复训练与传统康复训练在高血压合并急性心肌梗死患者康复效果比较分析

扫码查看
目的 探究沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合阶段性心脏康复训练在高血压合并急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)康复中的应用效果。方法 前瞻性选取2020年1月~2023年5月在无锡市锡山人民医院诊治的120例高血压合并AMI患者。以随机数表法将患者分为阶段康复组和传统康复组,各60例。传统康复组患者给予沙库巴曲缬沙坦及常规心脏康复训练干预,阶段康复组采用沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合阶段性心脏康复训练干预。观察比较两组患者干预前后血压、左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、心率、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、肌酐(Cr)、血钾、血清肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、N末端脑钠肽前体水平(NT-proBNP)及乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、6 min步行距离(6MWD)、常见不良反应及主要心脏不良事件发生率。结果 两组患者干预前后收缩压、舒张压、心率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。干预后,阶段康复组NT-proBNP、Cr、血钾、CK-MB水平和LVESD、LVEDD明显低于传统康复组,LVEF、6MWD和LDH水平明显高于传统康复组,差异均有统计学意义(t=5。087、12。334、3。102、4。603、4。130、3。500、5。488、6。245、4。275,P<0。05);干预期间,两组患者不良反应率和并发症总发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);6个月随访期间,阶段康复组主要心脏不良事件(major adverse cardiac events,MACE)发生率低于传统康复组,差异有统计学意义(t=5。566,P=0。018)。结论 沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合阶段性心脏康复训练在高血压合并AMI康复中的应用效果良好,能有效促进患者心脏功能恢复,并且安全性较高。
Comparative analysis of rehabilitation effect of staged cardiac rehabilitation training and traditional rehabilitation training in patients with hypertension complicated with acute myocardial infarction
Objective To explore the application effect of sacubitril valsartan combined with staged cardiac rehabilitation training in the rehabilitation of hypertension complicated with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A total of 120 patients with hypertension and AMI diagnosed and treated in Wuxi Xishan People's Hospital from January 2020 to May 2023 were prospectively selected as the research objects.The patients were divided into stage rehabilitation group and traditional rehabilitation group by random number table method,with 60 patients in each group.The patients in the traditional rehabilitation group were given sacubitril valsartan and routine cardiac rehabilitation training intervention,and the patients in the stage rehabilitation group were given sacubitril valsartan combined with stage cardiac rehabilitation training intervention.Blood pressure,left ventricular end-systolic dimension(LVESD),heart rate,left ventricular end-diastolic dimension(LVEDD),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),creatinine(Cr),serum potassium,creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB(CK-MB),N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),6 minute walking distance(6MWD),common adverse reactions and major adverse cardiac events were observed and compared between the two groups before and after intervention.Results There was no difference in systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,heart rate and adverse reaction rate between the two groups before and after intervention(P>0.05).After intervention,the levels of NT-proBNP,Cr,serum potassium,CK-MB,LVESD and LVEDD in the stage rehabilitation group were significantly lower than those in the traditional rehabilitation group,the levels of LVEF,6MWD and LDH were significantly higher than those in the traditional rehabilitation group(t=5.087,12.334,3.102,4.603,4.130,3.500,5.488,6.245,4.275,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups after intervention(P>0.05).The incidence of major adverse cardiac events(MACE)in the staged rehabilitation group was lower than that in the traditional rehabilitation group during the 6-month follow-up period(t=5.566,P=0.018).Conclusion The application effect of Sacubitril Valsartan combined with staged cardiac rehabilitation training in the rehabilitation of hypertension complicated with AMI is good,which can effectively promote the recovery of cardiac function and has high safety.

Sacubitril valsartanStaged cardiac rehabilitation trainingHypertensionAcute myocardial infarctionRehabilitation effect

华晓静、王晨、丁英

展开 >

214105 无锡市锡山人民医院心内科

沙库巴曲缬沙坦 阶段性心脏康复训练 高血压 急性心肌梗死 康复效果

江苏省无锡老龄科研课题项目

22WXLNY031

2024

中华保健医学杂志
中国人民解放军总后勤部卫生部保健局

中华保健医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.477
ISSN:1674-3245
年,卷(期):2024.26(4)