首页|急性心肌梗死患者延迟就医与家庭动力学的相关性分析

急性心肌梗死患者延迟就医与家庭动力学的相关性分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者延迟就医与家庭动力学的相关性。方法 前瞻性选取 2020 年 2 月~2023 年 2 月于南京市高淳人民医院就诊的 160 例AMI患者作为研究对象,根据AMI患者接受再灌注时间分为延迟就医组(>6 h,74 例)和非延迟就医组(≤6 h,86 例),并以年龄、性别、饮酒史、吸烟史、婚姻状况等为自变量,采用倾向性评分法以1∶1的比例进行匹配,两组各 63 例。采用一般资料调查表和系统家庭动力学自评问卷评进行调查。采用Pearson分析延迟就医与家庭动力学的相关性以及通过二元logistic回归分析AMI患者发生延迟就医的影响因素。结果 两组患者一般资料比较,居住类型、家庭年收入、居住地、就医方式、文化程度是 AMI 患者出现延迟就医的影响因素(χ2=5。801、7。208、5。842、5。387、6。236,P<0。05)。延迟就医组的家庭动力、疾病观念、家庭氛围、系统逻辑、个性化水平均低于非延迟就医组[(112。37±8。66)分vs。(91。34±6。92)分、(18。14±2。23)分vs。(14。63±1。87)分、(26。36±4。28)分vs。(21。45±3。17)分、(28。67±4。86)分vs。(22。57±3。75)分、(31。18±5。87)分 vs。(25。72±4。21)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=15。058、9。573、7。317、7。887、5。999,P<0。05)。Pearson相关性分析结果显示,AMI患者延迟就医时间与各个家庭动力学呈负相关(r=-0。804、-0。651、-0。548、-0。578、-0。474,P<0。05)。logistic回归分析结果显示,家庭动力学评分高、文化程度低、家庭年收入低、独居、居住地在农村、自行前往治疗是AMI患者延迟就医的独立危险因素(P<0。05)。结论 AMI患者的家庭动力学与延迟就医时间呈现负相关性,家庭动力学评分、文化程度、家庭年收入、独居、居住地、医疗保险是AMI患者延迟就医的影响因素。
Correlation analysis of medical treatment delay and family dynamics in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Objective To explore the correlation between medical treatment delay and family dynamics in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A total of 160 patients with AMI who were treated in Nanjing Gaochun People's Hospital from February 2020 to February 2023 were prospectively selected as the research objects.According to the reperfusion time of AMI patients,they were divided into delayed medical treatment group(>6 h,74 cases)and non-delayed medical treatment group(≤6 h,86 cases).Age,gender,drinking history,smoking history and marital status were used as independent variables,and propensity score method was used to match them at a ratio of 1∶1,with 63 cases in each group.The general information questionnaire and the systematic family dynamics self-assessment questionnaire were used to investigate.Pearson's analysis was used to analyze the correlation between medical delay and family dynamics,and binary logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of medical delay in AMI patients.Results The results of the comparison of the general data of the two groups of patients showed that the type of residence,annual household income,place of residence,way of medical treatment,and education level were the influencing factors for the delay of medical treatment in patients with AMI(χ2=5.801,7.208,5.842,5.387,6.236,P<0.05).The family motivation,disease concept,family atmosphere,system logic and personalization level of the delayed medical treatment group were lower than those of the non-delayed medical treatment group[(112.37±8.66)points vs.(91.34±6.92)points,(18.14±2.23)points vs.(14.63±1.87)points,(26.36±4.28)points vs.(21.45±3.17)points,(28.67±4.86)points vs.(22.57±3.75)points,(31.18±5.87)points vs.(25.72±4.21)points](t=15.058,9.573,7.317,7.887,5.999,P<0.05).Pearson the results of correlation analysis showed that the delay in AMI(r=-0.804,-0.651,-0.548,-0.578,-0.474,P<0.05).The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that high family dynamics score,low educational level,low annual family income,living alone,living in rural areas,and self to treatment were independent risk factors for delayed medical treatment in AMI patients(P<0.05).Conclusion There is a negative correlation between family dynamics and medical delay time in AMI patients.Family dynamics score,education level,family annual income,living alone,place of residence and medical insurance are the influencing factors of medical delay in AMI patients.

Acute myocardial infarctionMedical treatment delayFamily dynamicsPertinenceInfluencing factor

张益香、诸志萍、李素文

展开 >

211300 南京市高淳人民医院急诊科

急性心肌梗死 延迟就医 家庭动力学 相关性 影响因素

江苏省卫生健康委科研项目

H2021108

2024

中华保健医学杂志
中国人民解放军总后勤部卫生部保健局

中华保健医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.477
ISSN:1674-3245
年,卷(期):2024.26(5)