中华保健医学杂志2024,Vol.26Issue(5) :651-654.DOI:10.3969∕j.issn.1674-3245.2024.05.027

人乳头瘤病毒E6∕E7 mRNA检测在宫颈癌筛查、分流中的价值分析

Value analysis of HPV E6∕E7 mRNA detection in cervical cancer screening and diversion

袁丽娟 耿莉 成如兰 张志娟
中华保健医学杂志2024,Vol.26Issue(5) :651-654.DOI:10.3969∕j.issn.1674-3245.2024.05.027

人乳头瘤病毒E6∕E7 mRNA检测在宫颈癌筛查、分流中的价值分析

Value analysis of HPV E6∕E7 mRNA detection in cervical cancer screening and diversion

袁丽娟 1耿莉 1成如兰 1张志娟1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 224000 盐城,扬州大学医学院附属盐城妇幼保健院(盐城市妇幼保健院)妇女保健科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 比较人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)E6∕E7 mRNA 与 HPV-DNA 分别及联合液基薄层细胞学检查(thin-prep cytology test,TCT)在宫颈病变筛查中的价值及HPV E6∕E7 mRNA与HPV-DNA在非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)分流中的价值.方法 纳入 2022 年 1 月~2023 年 12 月于扬州大学医学院附属盐城妇幼保健院进行宫颈癌筛查的 2079 名受检者,行TCT、HPV-DNA、HPV E6∕E7 mRNA检测,剔除 3 项结果均阴性者,513 例行阴道镜活检.以病理报告为金标准,比较HPV-DNA和HPV E6∕E7 mRNA的宫颈病变检出率.对HPV-DNA和HPV E6∕E7 mRNA单独筛查及分别联合TCT筛查CIN2+(包括CIN2、CIN3 及宫颈癌)的效能进行比较.对HPV-DNA与HPV E6∕E7 mRNA分流ASC-US的效能进行比较.结果 HPV-DNA CIN1 检出率 4.08%高于HPV E6∕E7 mRNA的 2.45%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.787,P=0.003),而两种筛查方法CIN2+检出率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.250,P=0.617).HPV-DNA和HPV E6∕E7 mRNA筛查CIN2+的灵敏度为85.98%vs.81.09%、特异度为49.57%vs.84.24%,HPV-DNA的筛查灵敏度高于E6∕E7 mRNA、特异度低于E6∕E7 mRNA,两种筛查方法的特异度、阳性预测值及假阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ2=94.732、32.802、94.732,P=0.000).TCT 联合 HPV-DNA 和 TCT 联合 HPV E6∕E7 mRNA筛查CIN2+的灵敏度为94.51%vs.90.85%、特异度为85.37%vs.90.26%,联合TCT提高了筛查的灵敏度和特异度,但TCT联合HPV-DNA的筛查特异度仍低于TCT联合HPV E6∕E7 mRNA,两种联合筛查方法的特异度和假阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.871、3.871,P=0.049).HPV E6∕E7 mRNA在ASC-US中筛查CIN2+的ROC曲线下面积为 0.814,大于HPV-DNA的 0.704,差异有统计学意义(χ2=2.352,P<0.05).结论 与HPV-DNA相比,HPV E6∕E7 mRNA单独筛查及分别与TCT联合筛查CIN2+均有更高的特异度,对ASC-US的分流管理更具优势.

Abstract

Objective To compare the value of HPVE6∕E7 mRNA and HPV-DNA,respectively and in combination with TCT,in screening cervical lesions,and the value of E6∕E7 mRNA and HPV-DNA in ASC-US shunting.Methods 2079 women who underwent cervical cancer screening in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were included in the study.TCT,HPV DNA,and HPV E6∕E7 mRNA tests were performed and those with negative results in all 3 categories were excluded.513 cases underwent vaginal biopsy.Using pathological reports as the gold standard,compare the positivity rates of HPV DNA and HPV E6∕E7 mRNA.Comparison of the efficacy of HPV DNA and HPV E6∕E7 mRNA screening alone and in combination with TCT screening for CIN2+(including CIN2,CIN3,and cervical cancer).Compare the efficiency of ASC-US for HPV DNA and HPV E6∕E7 mRNA diversion.Results The CIN1 rate in the HPV-DNA group was 4.08%,which higher than 2.45%in the E6∕E7 mRNA group(χ2=8.787,P=0.003).There was no statistically significant difference in the CIN2+detection rate between the two screening methods(χ2=0.250,P=0.617).The sensitivity and specificity of HPV-DNA and E6∕E7 mRNA in screening for CIN2+were 85.98%vs.81.09%and 49.57%vs.84.24%,respectively.The sensitivity of HPV-DNA screening was higher than that of E6∕E7 mRNA,while the specificity was lower than that of E6∕E7 mRNA.The differences in specificity,positive predictive value,and false positive rate between the two screening methods were statistically significant(χ2=94.732,32.802,94.732,P=0.000).The sensitivity and specificity of TCT combined with HPV-DNA and TCT combined with E6∕E7 mRNA for screening CIN2+were 94.51%vs.90.85%and 85.37%vs.90.26%,respectively.The combination of TCT improved the sensitivity and specificity of screening,but the specificity of TCT combined with HPV-DNA was still lower than that of TCT combined with E6∕E7 mRNA.The difference in specificity and false positive rate between the two combined screening methods was statistically significant(χ2=3.871,3.871,P=0.049).The area under the ROC curve of E6∕E7 mRNA in screening for CIN2+in ASC-US is 0.814,which is greater than that of HPV-DNA by 0.704,and the difference is statistically significant(χ2=2.352,P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with HPV-DNA,E6∕E7 mRNA alone and in combination with TCT screening for CIN2+have higher specificity,and have more advantages in shunt management of ASC-US.

关键词

宫颈癌/人乳头瘤病毒/E6∕E7/mRNA/筛查/分流

Key words

Cervical cancer/Human papillomavirus/E6∕E7 mRNA/Screening/Diversion

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

盐城市医学科技发展计划(YK2021049)

盐城市医学科技发展计划(YK2020057)

出版年

2024
中华保健医学杂志
中国人民解放军总后勤部卫生部保健局

中华保健医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.477
ISSN:1674-3245
段落导航相关论文