首页|目标取样法和扫描取样法在圈养黑熊行为研究中的比较

目标取样法和扫描取样法在圈养黑熊行为研究中的比较

扫码查看
应用目标取样法和扫描取样法同时对5只圈养黑熊(Ursus thibetanus)的15种行为进行了观察和记录,并对两种方法所得结果进行比较和讨论,评估两种方法在动物行为学研究中的可靠性。结果表明:两种方法所得的行为实际频次间存在显著差异(χ2=4.388,P=0.036,df=1),相对频次间无显著差异(χ2=0.468,P=0.494,df=1);行为持续时间的长短是影响两种方法所得结果间差异的主要因素,其与相对偏差值(Rela-tive Deviation,RD)之间存在显著的负相关关系(实际频次:r=-0.900,P=0.000,df=13;相对频次:r=-0.898,P=0.000,df=13);两种方法所得行为发生频次间存在显著正相关关系(r=0.965,P=0.000,df=13);扫描取样法所得行为间的差异性分析结果中70.5%与目标取样法的分析结果一致,29.5%存在分歧,且在分歧组中,参与差异性分析的两种行为的持续时间之差极显著大于一致组(χ2=10.082,P=0.001,df=1)。
Comparison between Focal-Animal Sampling and Scan Sampling for Behavioral Observation of Black Bear in Captivity
The behaviors of five captive black bear(Ursus thibetanus) at Shanhe Farm in Harbin were investigated using focal-animal sampling and scan sampling methods simultaneously.The results obtained by the two methods were compared and discussed to evaluate the reliability of the two sampling methods.The comparisons results showed that the absolutely behavioral frequencies observed by focal-animal sampling method were significantly higher than those observed by scan sampling method(χ2=4.388,P=0.036,df=1).For the relative frequencies,however,the two methods got no different results(χ2=0.468,P=0.494,df=1).The duration of behaviors was negatively and significantly correlated to the RD value(absolute frequencies:r=-0.900,P=0.000,df=13;relative frequencies:r=-0.898,P=0.000,df=13)to show that the duration was one of the main factors that influenced the difference between the results obtained by the two methods.The two results of absolute frequencies,as well as those of relative frequencies observed by the two methods were all positively and significantly correlated(r=0.965,P=0.000,df=13).In each of the result groups(focal-animal sampling group and scan sampling group) of absolute frequencies,pairwise comparisons of frequency among all these 15 behaviors were performed to evaluate the consistency of the two methods to reveal that of the 105 comparisons in focal-animal sampling group,74 cases(70.5%)(hereafter,SG) were in line with that of scan sampling group,and 31 cases(29.5%)(hereafter,DG) showed different results.In DG group,the average difference value between the duration of the two behaviors involved in comparison significantly higher than that of SG(χ2=10.082,P=0.001,df=1).

observational samplingfocal-animal samplingscan samplingUrsus thibetanuscaptive

兰天明、田银平、胡晓楠、王彦磊、荆璞、范萌、邹琦、刘伟石

展开 >

东北林业大学野生动物资源学院,哈尔滨150040

盘锦市畜牧发展中心,盘锦124010

东北林业大学林学院,哈尔滨150040

行为 目标取样 扫描取样 黑熊 圈养

东北林业大学本科生创新性实验项目

2008003

2012

经济动物学报
吉林农业大学

经济动物学报

影响因子:0.822
ISSN:1007-7448
年,卷(期):2012.16(2)
  • 7
  • 7