首页|拐枣主栽品种果实的经济性状和营养成分分析及综合评价

拐枣主栽品种果实的经济性状和营养成分分析及综合评价

扫码查看
[目的]深入挖掘我国拐枣种质资源,了解目前生产上的主栽拐枣品种之间果实经济性状和营养成分的差异,为优良拐枣品种的选育、引种和果实加工利用提供参考。[方法]以我国拐枣主要产区陕西省旬阳市的 3 个主栽品种绿拐枣、胖娃娃拐枣和红拐枣为研究对象,调查测定果实的 6 个主要经济性状及 9 种营养成分、10 种矿物质营养元素和氨基酸的含量,采用单因素方差分析、变异分析、隶属函数值法、相关性分析和主成分分析等方法,对其果实品质进行了综合评价。[结果]经济性状中除了果实纵径和百果质量,不同品种间均呈现显著差异,其中单株产量为110。67~169。33 kg,果实质量为 26。77~34。77 g,横径为8。81~10。39 cm,纵径为 13。66~15。04 cm,果序轴粗度为 4。97~5。51 cm。主要营养成分中除了粗脂肪之外,不同品种拐枣之间均有显著差异,可溶性固形物含量为 33。58%~37。68%,可溶性糖含量为 25。04%~28。59%,可溶性蛋白含量为 1。54%~1。96%,维生素C含量为 340。93~488。37 mg/kg,总黄酮含量为 0。55%~1。45%,总多酚含量为0。43%~0。96%。3 个拐枣品种果肉均含有 10 种矿质元素和 17 种氨基酸。相关分析结果显示,果实质量和可溶性糖含量、果序轴粗度与可溶性蛋白含量极显著负相关,可滴定酸含量与果序轴粗度显著负相关,与可溶性蛋白含量显著正相关,水分含量与粗脂肪含量及总黄酮含量与总多酚含量存在显著正相关。主成分分析结果显示,影响拐枣果实品质的主要性状是果实质量、果实纵径、果序轴粗度、可溶性糖含量、可溶性蛋白含量、可滴定酸含量、单株产量、水分含量以及粗脂肪含量。[结论]绿拐枣果实性状的综合得分最高,品质最优,胖娃娃拐枣果实在经济性状方面表现优良,红拐枣果实的总黄酮、总多酚及甜味氨基酸含量最高,在生产和加工领域可根据不同品种的果实性状特点进行选择和推广。
Comprehensive evaluation and analysis on fruit economic characteristics and nutrient composition of Hovenia varieties
[Objective]In order to deeply excavate the Hovenia germplasm resources,the comprehensive evaluation and analysis on economic characteristics and nutrient composition among the main three varieties were determined.Our results could provide the basis for selection,introduction,and processing and utilization of Hovenia.[Method]Three main varieties including Lyu guaizao,Pang wawa guaizao,and Hong guaizao,were taken as the research objects,which were cultivated in Xunyang county,Shaanxi province,the primary cultivation region of Hovenia in China.Six main economic characteristics,nine kinds of nutrient composition,ten mineral elements and multi-amino acids of their fruits were detected.The fruit quality was evaluated comprehensively using the methods including single-factor variance analysis,coefficient of variation analysis,membership function value method,correlation analysis,and principal component analysis.[Result]The economic characteristics showed significant differences among varieties except for longitudinal diameter of fruits and hundred-fruit mass.The yield per plant was 110.67-169.33 kg,fruit mass was 26.77-34.77 g,transverse diameter was 8.81-10.39 cm,longitudinal diameter was 13.66-15.04 cm,and infructescence axis thickness was 4.97-5.51 cm.For the main nutrient composition,there were significant variations observed among different varieties excluding crude fat.The soluble solids content was 33.58%-37.68%,soluble sugars content was 25.04%-28.59%,soluble proteins content was 1.54%-1.96%,vitamin C content was 340.93-488.37 mg/kg,total flavonoids content was 0.55%-1.45%,and total polyphenols content was 0.43%-0.96% .Furthermore,the fruit contained 10 kinds of mineral elements and 17 kinds of amino acids.The results of the correlation analysis revealed an extremely significant negative correlation between the fruit mass and soluble sugar content,as well as thickness of the infructescence axis and soluble protein content.Additionally,a significant negative correlation was observed between titratable acid content and the thickness of the infructescence axis,while a significant positive correlation was found between soluble protein content.Furthermore,there existed significant positive correlation between water content and crude fat content,as well as total flavonoids content and total polyphenols content.The principal component analysis showed that the main characteristics affecting the fruit quality were fruit mass,fruit longitudinal diameter,infructescence axis thickness,soluble sugar content,soluble protein content,titratable acid content,yield per plant,water content,and crude fat content.[Conclusion]The fruit characteristics of Lyu guaizao exhibits the highest score and superior nutritional quality,while the Pang wawa guaizao performs well in economic characteristics.In addition,Hong guaizao shows the highest content of total flavonoids,total polyphenols,and sweet amino acids.Therefore,different varieties could be selected and promoted in the field of production and processing according to their distinct fruit characteristics.

Hoveniaeconomic characteristicsnutrient compositioncomprehensive evaluation

卢孟飞、陈瞳晖、莫双凤、向甲斌、梁琪、赖勇、丁申、陈圆圆、张党权、李明婉

展开 >

河南农业大学 林学院,河南 郑州 450046

旬阳市林业技术推广站,陕西 安康 725700

拐枣 经济性状 营养成分 综合评价

国家自然科学基金青年项目河南省科技攻关项目

32000267232102111018

2024

经济林研究
中南林业科技大学

经济林研究

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.423
ISSN:1003-8981
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)