首页|间作模式对油橄榄土壤养分及土壤微生物的影响

间作模式对油橄榄土壤养分及土壤微生物的影响

扫码查看
[目的]为开拓油橄榄高效栽培新模式和改善油橄榄林地土壤生态环境提供参考。[方法]以油橄榄单作为对照(CK),以油橄榄×滇黄精(FD)、油橄榄×紫花苜蓿草(FZ)、油橄榄×紫花苜蓿草×黑麦草×金鸡菊(F3)3种间作模式为研究对象,探索不同间作模式下土壤养分含量变化和土壤微生物多样性及群落结构差异,并分析其相关性。[结果]相较于单作CK,FD间作模式下土壤养分速效钾、有效磷、碱解氮含量分别显著降低了 55。45%、45。55%和 33。46%(P<0。05);FZ模式下土壤有机碳、碱解氮和速效钾含量分别显著降低了60。73%、77。48%和56。01%,全钾、有效磷含量显著提高了29。40%和49。87%;F3模式下除碱解氮含量降低外,土壤其他养分含量均有所增加,其中全钾含量显著增加了24。59%。4种模式下,共获得38 652个土壤细菌OTUs,3 059个真菌OTUs。根据细菌特有的OTUs数量由高到低排序,间作模式依次为F3、CK、FD、FZ;根据真菌特有的OTUs数量由高到低排序,间作模式依次为F3、FD、CK、FZ。α多样性分析结果表明,各间作模式下细菌和真菌在多个多样性指数间无显著差异。各间作模式下土壤细菌在门水平上优势菌门均为放线菌门、变形菌门、酸杆菌门,真菌以子囊菌门为绝对优势菌群,且间作后子囊菌门相对丰度均大于CK;在属水平上,间作明显改变了真菌群落结构,3种间作处理相较于CK均增加了其他功能真菌群落的相对丰度,同时FD和FZ模式增加了常见土壤致病菌属的相对丰度。土壤养分含量与门水平上部分细菌和真菌群落的相对丰度呈现极显著相关性,土壤养分含量对部分细菌和真菌群落组成和丰度有重要影响。[结论]3种间作模式均改变了土壤养分含量及微生物群落结构,以真菌最为明显。FD、FZ模式与油橄榄存在养分资源竞争和负效应。F3间作模式提高油橄榄林地土壤养分含量及改善林地土壤生态环境的效果最佳,建议生产上选用多草种间作模式。
Effects of intercropping modes of olive on soil nutrients and soil microorganisms
[Objective]To provide a reference for the development of efficient new cultivation modes for olive oil and the improvement of soil ecological environments in olive orchards.[Method]Olive monoculture was used as the control(CK),and three intercropping modes were studied:olive×polygonatum kingianum(FD),olive×alfalfa(FZ),and olive×alfalfa×ryegrass×coreopsis(F3).The study aimed to explore the changes in soil nutrient content and the differences in soil microbial diversity and community structure under different intercropping modes,and analyze their correlations.[Result]Compared to the monoculture CK,the FD intercropping mode significantly reduced the contents of available potassium(AK),available phosphorus(AP),and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen(AN)content by 55.45%,45.55%,and 33.46%,respectively(P<0.05).In the FZ mode,the content of organic carbon(OC),alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen(AN),and available potassium(AK)decreased significantly by 60.73%,77.48%,and 56.01%,respectively,while the content of total potassium(TK)and available phosphorus(AP)increased significantly by 29.40%and 49.87%,respectively.In the F3 mode,except for a decrease in alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen(AN),the contents of other soil nutrients increased,with total potassium(TK)increasing significantly by 24.59%.A total of 38,652 bacterial OTUs and 3,059 fungal OTUs were identified across all four modes.According to the number of bacterial unique OTUs from high to low,the intercropping modes was F3,CK,FD,FZ;According to the number of fungal-specific OTUs ranked from high to low,the intercropping modes was successively F3,FD,CK,and FZ.Alpha diversity analysis showed no significant differences in bacterial and fungal diversity indices among the intercropping modes.At the phylum level,the dominant bacterial phyla across all modes were Actinobacteria,Proteobacteria,and Acidobacteria,while Ascomycota was the dominant fungal phylum.After intercropping,the relative abundance of Ascomycota increased compared to CK.At the genus level,intercropping significantly altered the fungal community structure.All three intercropping treatments increased the relative abundance of other functional fungal communities compared to CK,while the FD and FZ modes also increased the relative abundance of common soil pathogenic genera.The relative abundance of certain bacterial and fungal communities at the phylum level showed significant correlations with soil nutrient contents,indicating that soil nutrient content has an important impact on the composition and abundance of certain bacterial and fungal communities.[Conclusion]All three intercropping modes altered soil nutrient content and microbial community structure,with the most significant changes observed in fungi.The FD and FZ modes led to nutrient competition and negative effects with olive trees.The F3 intercropping mode had the best effect on improving soil nutrient content and the soil ecological environment of olive orchards.Therefore,it is recommended to adopt the multi-species grass intercropping mode in production.

oliveintercroppingsoil nutrient,microbial diversitystructure of community

黄楚亦、胡青、赵敏、陆斌、张光华、王猛

展开 >

西南林业大学 林学院,云南 昆明 650224

云南省林业和草原科学院,云南 昆明 650201

永胜茂格农业开发有限公司,云南 丽江 674100

油橄榄 间作 土壤养分 微生物多样性 群落结构

2024

经济林研究
中南林业科技大学

经济林研究

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.423
ISSN:1003-8981
年,卷(期):2024.42(4)