首页|22份抗寒梨品种果实品质综合评价

22份抗寒梨品种果实品质综合评价

扫码查看
[目的]探究抗寒梨果实品质评价的主要影响指标,为建立果实品质评价体系,区域梨品种优化升级及合理区划提供参考依据。[方法]以 22 份抗寒梨品种果实为试材,测定 6 个品质指标,采用差异性分析、相关性分析、主成分分析和聚类分析等方法,根据前 4 个主成分得分及相应权重计算综合得分并对参试品种进行排名。[结果]同一品质指标参试品种间存在明显差异,变异系数在 11%~85%。果形指数与其他 5 项品质指标间相关性不显著;可溶性固形物含量与可溶性糖含量,糖酸比与固酸比呈极显著正相关(P<0。01);可滴定酸含量与糖酸比、固酸比呈极显著负相关(P<0。01)。转化数据后提取出 4 个主成分,累计贡献率可达99。58%;主成分 1 代表指标糖酸比、固酸比,主成分 2 代表指标可溶性固形物,主成分 3 代表指标果形指数,主成分4代表指标可滴定酸。果实品质综合评价中'寒露梨''寒酥梨''南果梨''寒香梨''红南果'5个品种综合得分靠前。聚类分析在遗传距离为 9 时将 22 份抗寒梨品种分为 5 类;类群Ⅰ包含 10 份品种,为秋子梨或含秋子梨血缘品种;类群Ⅱ包含 4 份品种,总体表现果形整齐,外观品质突出;类群Ⅲ的 5 份品种和类群Ⅳ的 2 份品种多含有苹果梨血缘,但类群Ⅳ品种果实更为酥脆;类群Ⅴ仅有1 份品种'寒露梨',其糖酸比与固酸比显著高于其他品种,风味甘甜。[结论]果形指数、可溶性固形物含量、糖酸比、固酸比等可作为抗寒梨果实品质综合评价的核心指标;因子分析与聚类分析结果比较一致,可对抗寒梨果实品质进行综合评价。
Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of 22 cold-resistant pear varieties
[Objective]In order to explore the main influencing indexes of fruit quality evaluation of cold-resistant pear,the fruit quality evaluation system of varieties was established to provide reference for the optimization and upgrading of regional pear varieties and reasonable zoning.[Method]The fruits of 22 cold-resistant pear varieties were used as test materials,and six quality indexes were determined.The comprehensive scores were calculated according to the scores of the first four principal components and the corresponding weights by difference analysis,correlation analysis,principal component analysis and cluster analysis.[Result]There were significant differences in the same quality index among the tested varieties,and the coefficient of variation was from 11%to 85%.There was no significant correlation between fruit shape index and other five quality indexes.Soluble solids content was significantly positively correlated with soluble sugar content,sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio(P<0.01).Titratable acid content was significantly negatively correlated with sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio(P<0.01).Four principal components were extracted from the transformation data analysis,and principal component 1 represented the sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio.Principal component 2 represents the index of soluble solids;principal component 3 represents fruit shape index;principal component 4 represents the index of titratable acid,and the cumulative contribution rate of these four principal components reached 99.58%;factor analysis screened out'Hanluli''Hansuli''Nanguoli''Hanxiangli''Hongnanguo'five top-ranking varieties;cluster analysis divided 22 cold-resistant pear varieties into five categories at a genetic distance of 9.Group I included 10 varieties with autumn pear or autumn pear blood relationship.The four varieties of group Ⅱhad neat fruit shape and outstanding appearance quality.The five varieties of group Ⅲ and the two varieties of group Ⅳmostly had the pedigree of apple pear,but the fruit of group Ⅳ was crisper.Group Ⅴ had only one variety of'Hanluli',and its sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio were significantly higher than other varieties,and the flavor was sweet.[Conclusion]Fruit shape index,soluble solids,sugar-acid ratio and solid-acid ratio can be used as the core indicators for the evaluation of cold-resistant pear fruit quality.The results of factor analysis and cluster analysis were consistent,which could be used to comprehensively evaluate the quality of cold-resistant pear fruit.

pearfruit qualityprincipal component analysiscomprehensive evaluation

梅滨玉、武春昊、卢明艳、闫兴凯、赵滢、张茂君、王强

展开 >

延边大学 农学院,吉林 延吉 133002

吉林省农业科学院(中国农业科技东北创新中心) 果树研究所,吉林 公主岭 136100

吉林省农业科学院(中国农业科技东北创新中心) 农业农村部东北地区(吉林)果树科学观测试验站,吉林 公主岭 136100

果实品质 主成分分析 综合评价

2024

经济林研究
中南林业科技大学

经济林研究

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.423
ISSN:1003-8981
年,卷(期):2024.42(4)