首页|左束支区域起搏在改善右束支阻滞、射血分数降低患者心功能中的应用效果

左束支区域起搏在改善右束支阻滞、射血分数降低患者心功能中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 探究左束支区域起搏(LBBaP)在改善右束支阻滞(RBBB)、射血分数降低(LVEF)≤35%患者心电图及心功能改善的效果。方法 选取2020 年2 月到2022 年8 月期间九江市第一人民医院心血管内科的80 例RBBB且LVEF≤35%患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(40 例)及试验组(40例)。对照组给予双室起搏(Bi-V),试验组给予LBBaP。比较两组患者治疗前后左室舒张末径(LVDED)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、6 min 步行距离(6MWD)、NN 间期标准差(SDNN)、相邻NN 间期之差的均方根值(rMSSD)、每5 分钟NN 间期均值的标准差(SDANN)、ST-T 波改变情况、心力衰竭再入院率、死亡发生率、主要并发症(心脏穿孔、心包积血、恶性心律失常、心源性猝死和急性心肌梗死)。结果 两组患者治疗前LVDED、LVEF、6MWD 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。两组患者治疗后LVDED 低于本组治疗前,LVEF 高于本组治疗前,6MWD 长于本组治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。试验组治疗后低于对照组,LVEF 高于对照组,6MWD 长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。试验组的ST-T 波改变率高于对照组,SDNN、rMSSD、SDANN 均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。试验组心力衰竭再入院率、并发症发生率、死亡率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 左束支区域起搏可有效改善心功能及心电图指标,降低心力衰竭再入院率、并发症发生率、死亡率,值得推广。
Application effect of left bundle branch regional pacing in improving car-diac function in patients with right bundle branch block and reduced ejec-tion fraction
Objective To investigate the effect of left bundle branch regional pacing(LBBaP)in improving electrocardio-graphic and cardiac function improvement in patients with right bundle branch block(RBBB)and reduced ejection fraction(LVEF)≤ 35%.Methods Eighty patients with RBBB and LVEF ≤ 35%from the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the First People's Hospital of Jiujiang City from February 2020 to August 2022 were selected as study subjects and were di-videdinto control group(40 patients)and experimental group(40 patients)using the random number table method.The con-trol group was given biventricular pacing(Bi-V)and the experimental group was given LBBaP.The left ventricular end-di-astolic diameter(LVDED),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),6-min walk distance(6MWD),standard deviation of NN intervals(SDNN),root mean square of the difference between adjacent NN intervals(rMSSD),standard deviation of mean NN interval(SDANN)every 5 min,ST-T wave alterations,heart failure readmission rate,incidence of death,major complica-tions(cardiac perforation,pericardial effusion,malignant arrhythmia,sudden cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction)were compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results There were no significant differences in LVDED,LVEF and 6MWD between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,LVDED of patients in both groups was lower than before treatment in this group,LVEF was higher than before treatment in this group,and 6MWD was longer than before treatment in this group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The LVDED in the experi-mental group was lower than that in the control group after treatment,the LVEF was higher than that in the control group,and the 6MWD was longer than that in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The ST-T wave alteration rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group,and SDNN,rMSSD and SDANN were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The readmission rate,com-plication rate and mortality rate of heart failure in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Left bundle branch regional pacing can effectively improve cardiac function and electrocardiograph indexes,reduce the readmission rate,complication rate and mortality rate of heart failure,and is worth promoting.

Left bundle branch region pacingRight bundle branch blockEjection fractionElectrocardiogramCardiac function improvement

张历、韩青、廖然、柳万千、陈玲

展开 >

江西省九江市第一人民医院心血管内科,江西九江 332000

左束支区域起搏 右束支阻滞 射血分数 心电图 心功能改善

江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目

SKJP220219852

2024

中国当代医药
中国保健协会 当代创新(北京)医药科学研究院

中国当代医药

影响因子:1.215
ISSN:1674-4721
年,卷(期):2024.31(3)
  • 22