首页|血清降钙素原定量检测对细菌性血流感染的诊断价值

血清降钙素原定量检测对细菌性血流感染的诊断价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨血清降钙素原(PCT)的定量检测对细菌性血流感染的诊断预测价值,为临床合理经验性地使用抗生素提供依据。方法 回顾性分析2019年5月至2022年6月阳江市中医医院行血培养患者的临床资料,其中血培养阳性且为细菌性血流感染的235例作为血流感染组,血培养阴性的患者240例为对照组,所有患者行PCT检测,比较两组的PCT水平,绘制ROC曲线分析PCT水平对血流感染的预测价值。再将血流感染组按病原菌类型分为革兰氏阳性菌组(G+组)100例,革兰氏阴性菌组(G-组)135例,比较两组PCT水平对不同病原菌类型的细菌性血流感染的诊断价值;按感染方式的不同,将本研究的血流感染235例设为全身感染组,同期收集的伤口分泌物感染共180例设为局部感染组,比较两组的PCT水平。结果 血流感染组中PCT水平高于对照组的PCT,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。当PCT为0。64 ng/ml作为最佳节点时,此时PCT诊断细菌性血流感染的特异性、敏感性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值分别为88%、64%、45%、85%。G-组的PCT水平高于G+组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),当PCT水平为0。73 ng/ml为最佳节点时,诊断G-菌感染的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为72%,82%,46%、84%,G+菌感染主要为金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌,而大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌在G-菌感染中最常见。全身感染组PCT水平高于局部感染组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),当PCT水平为0。12 ng/ml作为截断值时,此时诊断全身感染的敏感性和特异性分别为92%,80%。结论 PCT水平的检测有助于血流感染的早期诊断,可以给临床合理使用抗菌药物提供依据,降低患者病死率。
Diagnostic value of quantitative detection of serum procalcitonin in bacte-rial bloodstream infection
Objective To investigate the predictive value of serum procalcitonin(PCT)quantitative detection for the diag-nosis of bacterial bloodstream infection,providing a basis for the clinical rational empirical use of antibiotics.Methods Clinical data of patients undergoing blood culture in Yangjiang City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed,among which 235 patients with positive blood culture and bacterial blood-stream infection were taken as the bloodstream infection group,and 240 patients with negative blood culture were taken as the control group.PCT detection was performed in all patients,PCT levels of the two groups were compared,and ROC curve was drawn to analyze the predictive value of PCT levels on bloodstream infection.Then the blood flow infection group was divided into 100 Gram-positive bacteria group(G+group)and 135 Gram-negative bacteria group(G-group)according to pathogenic bacteria types.The diagnostic value of PCT levels in two groups for bacterial bloodstream infections with different pathogenic bacteria types were compared.According to the different modes of infection,235 cases of bloodstream infection in this study were set as systemic infection group,and 180 cases of wound secretion infection collected during the same pe-riod were set as local infection group.The PCT levels of the two groups were compared.Results The level of PCT in blood flow infection group was higher than that in control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).When the PCT was 0.64 ng/ml as the best cut-off point,the specificity,sensitivity,negative predictive value and positive predictive value of PCT in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infection were 88%,64%,45%and 85%,respectively.The PCT level of G-group was higher than that of G+group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).When PCT level was 0.73 ng/ml as the optimal cut-off point,the sensitivity,specificity,negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the diagnosis of G-bacterial infection were 72%,82%,46%and 84%,respectively.G+bacteria were mainly Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis,while Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most common among G-bacteria infections.The PCT level in the systemic infection group was higher than that in the local infection group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).When the PCT level was 0.12 ng/ml as the cut-off value,the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of systemic infection were 92%and 80%,respectively.Conclusion PCT level detection is bene-ficial for the early diagnosis of bloodstream infections and can provide a basis for the clinical rational use of antimicrobial drugs,thereby reducing patient mortality.

Bloodstream infectionProcalcitoninGram-negative bacteriaGram-positive bacteria

赖苑双、徐耀祥、余飞燕、陈俏、曾宛萍

展开 >

广东省阳江市中医医院检验科,广 东阳江 529500

血流感染 降钙素原 革兰氏阴性菌 革兰氏阳性菌

2024

中国当代医药
中国保健协会 当代创新(北京)医药科学研究院

中国当代医药

影响因子:1.215
ISSN:1674-4721
年,卷(期):2024.31(7)
  • 22