中国当代医药2024,Vol.31Issue(25) :83-86.

腹腔镜下保留及切除输卵管在输卵管妊娠中的应用效果比较

Comparison of the application effect of laparoscopic tubal retention and resection in tubal pregnancy

郝小强 石洪堂 张振涛
中国当代医药2024,Vol.31Issue(25) :83-86.

腹腔镜下保留及切除输卵管在输卵管妊娠中的应用效果比较

Comparison of the application effect of laparoscopic tubal retention and resection in tubal pregnancy

郝小强 1石洪堂 1张振涛1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 滨州医学院附属医院妇产科,山东滨州 256600
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 比较分析在输卵管妊娠中实施腹腔镜下保留输卵管、切除输卵管治疗的临床效果.方法 回顾性选择2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在滨州医学院附属医院就诊的 128 例输卵管妊娠患者作为研究对象,按照腹腔镜下是否保留输卵管分为观察组(n=64)和对照组(n=64).观察组接受腹腔镜下保留输卵管治疗,对照组接受腹腔镜下切除输卵管治疗.比较两组治疗成功率、临床指标、随访妊娠结局及人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)水平变化情况.结果 两组在治疗成功率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组手术用时及术中出血量高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组血清β-HCG恢复至正常时间及术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术前两组β-HCG水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后 3、7 d,β-HCG水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后 3、7 d β-HCG降低率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组正常妊娠率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 在输卵管妊娠中,腹腔镜下保留、切除输卵管均具有较高的治疗成功率,切除输卵管在手术时间、术中出血及术后β-HCG降低均优于保留输卵管;但保留输卵管术后正常妊娠概率更高.

Abstract

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopic fallopian tube preservation and salpingec-tomy in the treatment of tubal pregnancy.Methods A total of 128 cases of tubal pregnancy treated in Binzhou Medical Uni-versity Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively selected as the study objects.According to whether tubal retention was performed under laparoscopy,they were divided into observation group(n=64)and control group(n=64).The observation group received tubal retention treatment under laparoscopy.The control group received laparoscopic fallopian tube resection.The treatment success rate,clinical indexes,follow-up pregnancy outcome and human chorionic gonadotropin(β-HCG)level were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in treat-ment success rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The operation time and blood loss in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differ-ences in the recovery time of serum β-HCG to normal and postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in β-HCG level between the two groups before operation(P>0.05).The β-HCG level in the observation group was higher than that in the control group 3 and 7 days after operation,and the differ-ence was statistically significant(P<0.05).The reduction rate of β-HCG in the observation group was lower than that in the control group at 3 and 7 days after operation,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions In the treatment of tubal pregnancy,laparoscopic salpingotomy and salpingectomy have a high success rate.Salpingotomy is better than salpingectomy in operation time,intraoperative bleeding and postoperative β-HCG reduction.However,tubal preservation surgery has a higher rate of normal pregnancy.

关键词

腹腔镜/保留输卵管/切除输卵管/输卵管妊娠

Key words

Laparoscopy/Preservation of fallopian tubes/Removal of fallopian tubes/Tubal pregnancy

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国当代医药
中国保健协会 当代创新(北京)医药科学研究院

中国当代医药

影响因子:1.215
ISSN:1674-4721
段落导航相关论文