首页|"保卫"还是"背离"马克思?——试论阿尔都塞"认识论断裂"理论的三个问题

"保卫"还是"背离"马克思?——试论阿尔都塞"认识论断裂"理论的三个问题

扫码查看
"认识论断裂"是阿尔都塞用来说明马克思主义理论实践特殊性的核心论点.阿尔都塞围绕马克思前后思想断裂的三个问题提出了自己的见解:第一,青年马克思的人本学总问题来自费尔巴哈哲学,青年马克思不是马克思主义者,而是费尔巴哈主义者;第二,马克思主义的理论实践只有以唯物史观为理论前提才能产生科学认识,而青年马克思的人道主义只能被宣布为意识形态;第三,马克思的辩证法构成了科学认识的理论基础,而黑格尔的哲学体系是意识形态的幻象,但马克思对关于辩证法的两个比喻——"颠倒"与"发现合理内核"——难以提供合理解释.从对青年马克思与费尔巴哈思想关系的分析,到将青年马克思的理论划归到唯物史观的对立面,再到对马克思在辩证法问题上使用的两个比喻的否定,阿尔都塞都在一定程度上背离了马克思的本意.
"Defend"or"Deviate from"Marx?——On Three Issues of Althusser's Theory of"Epistemological Rupture"
"Epistemological rupture"is the core argument used by Althusser to explain the particularity of Marxist theoretical practice.In For Marx,Althusser puts forward his own views on three questions about the rupture of Marx's thought before and after.Firstly,the problematic of young Marx's humanism comes from Feuerbach philosophy,young Marx is not a Marxist,but a Feuerbach Humanist;Second,the theoretical practice of Marxism can produce scientific understanding only under the theoretical premise of historical materialism,and the humanism of young Marx can only be declared as ideology by Marx.Third,Marx's dialectics constitutes the theoretical basis of scientific understanding,while Hegel's philosophical system is an ideological illusion.Althusser believes that it is difficult to make a strict rational explanation around the two metaphors of dialectics("inversion"and"discovery of rational core").In fact,from the analysis of the ideological relationship between young Marx and Feuerbach,to the division of Young Marx's theory into the opposite of the materialist view of history,and to the negation of the two metaphors used by Marx on the issue of dialectics,Althusser deviates from Marx's original intention to a certain extent.

For Marxepistemological fractureproblematicmaterialist conception of historydialectic

王世强

展开 >

吉林大学 哲学社会学院,吉林 长春 130012

《保卫马克思》 认识论断裂 总问题 唯物史观 辩证法

2024

济宁学院学报
济宁学院

济宁学院学报

影响因子:0.175
ISSN:1004-1877
年,卷(期):2024.45(6)