首页|规范之维:哈贝马斯重建历史唯物主义的时代审思

规范之维:哈贝马斯重建历史唯物主义的时代审思

扫码查看
规范问题一直是当代西方哲学的中心论题,在元伦理学、法哲学和社会哲学等研究领域有着突出地位.规范也是法兰克福学派第二代旗手哈贝马斯重建历史唯物主义的阿里阿德涅之线.哈贝马斯在完成历史唯物主义规范结构重建的基础上,强调了其中蕴含的道德规范与法律规范的现实指向,创新了晚期资本主义合法性危机的现代性批判范式.然而,他不重视物质生产力与社会劳动的根基性作用而空谈"虚的"主体间交往与学习,因此哈贝马斯的重建历史唯物主义理论陷入了西方哲学"坐而论道"的乌托邦困境,其规范价值在实践上受到了束缚与约束.因此,立足中国特色社会主义新时代,推进马克思主义中国化时代化有必要认真审视哈贝马斯的历史唯物主义重建工作,高扬马克思主义旗帜,在生活实践的基础上为中国式现代化筑牢规范性根基.
Normative Dimension:the Contemporary Reflection on Habermas's Reconstruction of Historical Materialism
The issue of norms has been the central thesis of contemporary Western philosophy,and has a prominent position in the research fields of meta-ethics,philosophy of law and social philosophy.Norms are also the Ariadne's line of reconstruction of historical materialism by Habermas,the second-generation of the Frankfurt School.On the basis of completing the reconstruction of the normative structure of historical materialism,he emphasized the reality of moral norms and legal norms implied in it,and innovated the paradigm of modernity critique of the legitimacy crisis of late capitalism.However,the empty talk of"virtual"intersubjective interaction and learning without paying attention to the fundamental role of material productive forces and social labor makes Habermas'reconstruction of historical materialism fall into the Utopian dilemma of the Western philosophical tradition of"sitting on the sidelines",and its normative value is bound and restricted by the practical sense of the concept.Its normative value is bound and constrained in the practical sense.Therefore,in the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics,it is necessary to revisit Habermas'reconstruction of historical materialism,to raise the banner of Marxism,and to build a firm normative foundation for the realization of Chinese modernization on the basis of real-life practices.

Habermashistorical materialismnorms

丁欣、孙炳炎

展开 >

南开大学 马克思主义学院,天津 300350

哈贝马斯 历史唯物主义 规范

2024

济宁学院学报
济宁学院

济宁学院学报

影响因子:0.175
ISSN:1004-1877
年,卷(期):2024.45(6)