江苏行政学院学报2024,Issue(3) :123-129.

民初大理院抵制"治外法权"之路径析论

Analysis of the Path of Dali Academy in Its Struggle against"Extraterritoriality"in the Early Period of Republic of China——Centered on Civil Case Collection of the Dali Academy

陈晓枫 李梦媛
江苏行政学院学报2024,Issue(3) :123-129.

民初大理院抵制"治外法权"之路径析论

Analysis of the Path of Dali Academy in Its Struggle against"Extraterritoriality"in the Early Period of Republic of China——Centered on Civil Case Collection of the Dali Academy

陈晓枫 1李梦媛1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 武汉大学法学院,武汉 430072
  • 折叠

摘要

自唐开始,中国在涉外司法案件中形成以"属地主义"为管辖原则的"司法主权"传统.然而近代中国因鸦片战争战败,冲击湮灭原存的涉外法律原则,列强以"治外法权"颠覆原有传统,大理院则以收回治外法权为目的,改寺为院.其利用审判章程与行政规章的管辖间隙,援引国际私法,择取对自身有利的理论学说,获得案件管辖权,适用中法为法准据,以使中国司法权正当行使,同时也纠正"媚外曲法"案件的审判结果,排除"治外法权"对中国司法侵扰.

Abstract

Since the Tang Dynasty,China had developed a tradition of"judicial sovereignty"in foreign-related legal cases,based on the principle of"territory".However,the defeat in the Opium Wars in modem history disrupted the exist-ing principles related to foreign affairs laws.The western powers subverted the traditional judicial sovereignty with"extra-territorial rights";in response,the Dali Academy aimed at the recovery of these rights and transformed itself from the for-mer"institute"system to a court of law.The Dali Academy took advantage of the gaps between trial procedures and admin-istrative regulations,referred on international private laws,and selectively adopted theories favorable to its interests.It sought jurisdiction over cases and applied Chinese law as the legal basis to legitimately exercise Chinese judicial authority.At the same time,the Dali Academy corrected trial outcomes of cases that excessively favored foreigners,thereby mitigating the intrusion of"extraterritorial rights"over Chinese judiciary.

关键词

大理院/治外法权/司法主权/抵制路径

Key words

Dali Academy/extraterritoriality/judiciary sovereignty/path of resistance

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家社科基金项目(18BFX026)

出版年

2024
江苏行政学院学报
江苏省行政学院

江苏行政学院学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.709
ISSN:1009-8860
段落导航相关论文