首页|灌溉和种植方式对稻田水氮利用及损失的影响

灌溉和种植方式对稻田水氮利用及损失的影响

扫码查看
[目的]旨在探究灌溉和种植方式对稻田氮素损失与水分利用的影响特征。[方法]选取手工栽插(HT)、抛秧(ST)、机插(MT)、直播(DS)4种种植方式和淹水灌溉(FI)、间歇灌溉(II)2种灌溉模式,开展晚稻大田小区试验,分析评价不同灌溉和种植方式下稻田水量平衡、水分利用效率以及氮素径流淋溶损失特征。[结果]不同灌溉模式的水分利用效率均以间歇灌溉更高,不同种植方式的水分利用效率总体表现由高到低依次为HT(ST)、MT和DS。间歇灌溉模式下各种植方式处理的灌水量、耗水量、渗漏量、蒸发蒸腾量较淹水灌溉模式分别降低9。87%~22。11%、9。65%~21。49%、1。46%~3。64%、11。18%~27。15%。种植方式和灌溉模式对氮素径流和淋溶流失量影响较大,其流失量分别占施肥量的0。02%~0。17%和2。33%~3。53%。在相同灌溉模式下,不同种植方式处理的氮素地表径流损失量和淋溶损失量均由大到小依次为DS、MT、ST和HT。受灌溉模式和种植方式的影响,不同处理淋溶量和氮素淋溶损失量在各生育期内存在差异,其中以苗期和分蘖前期损失量较高,占全生育期的比例分别为43。35%~53。79%、6。67%~22。38%。综合灌溉模式和种植方式,不同处理的产量和水分利用效率均以HT-II最高、DS-FI最低,氮素淋溶损失则以HT-II最低、DS-FI最高。[结论]间歇灌溉有利于提高水稻产量和水分利用效率,直播稻的水分消耗和氮素损失高于移栽稻,手工栽插配合间歇灌溉有利于提高水稻水分利用效率和降低稻田氮素流失。在双季晚稻生产实践中,可通过加强苗期和分蘖前期的水分管理来减少稻田淋溶和氮素的淋溶损失,从而提高稻田的环境效应。
Effect of irrigation and planting methods on water and nitrogen utilization and loss in paddy fields
[Objective]To explore the effect characteristics of irrigation and planting methods on nitrogen loss and water utilisation in rice fields.[Method]We selected four planting methods:hand-transplanting(HT),seedling throwing(ST),machine-transplanting(MT)and direct seeding(DS),and two irrigation modes:flooding irrigation(FI)and intermittent irrigation(II),and carried out a plot experiment on late rice to analyse and evaluate the characteristics of paddy rice field water balance,water-use efficiency,and nitrogen runoff and leaching loss under different irrigation and planting modes.[Result]The results showed that:the water use efficiency of different irrigation modes was higher in intermittent irrigation,and the water use efficiency of different planting modes was HT(ST)>MT>DS.The water quantity,water consumption,leakage,and evapotranspiration were reduced by 9.87%-22.11%,9.65%-21.49%,1.46%-3.64%,and 11.18%-27.15%,respectively,for the treatments of each cropping method under the intermittent irrigation pattern as compared to the flooded irrigation pattern.Planting method and irrigation pattern had a greater impact on nitrogen runoff and leaching loss,which accounted for 0.02%-0.17%and 2.33%-3.53%of the applied fertiliser,respectively.Under the same irrigation pattern,the nitrogen surface runoff loss and leaching loss of different planting treatments were DS>MT>ST>HT.The leaching amount and nitrogen leaching loss of different treatments varied in each fertility period under the influence of irrigation pattern and planting method,among which the loss was higher in seedling and pre-tiller stage,which accounted for the proportion of the whole fertility period,respectively,43.35%-53.79%and 6.67%.53.79%,and 6.67%-22.38%,respectively.With the combined irrigation pattern and planting method,the yield and water use efficiency of different treatments were the highest in HT-II and the lowest in DS-FI,while the nitrogen leaching loss was the lowest in HT-II and the highest in DS-FI.[Conclusion]Intermittent irrigation is beneficial to improve rice yield and water use efficiency,water consumption and nitrogen loss of direct seeding rice are higher than that of transplanted rice,and hand-planting with intermittent irrigation is beneficial to improve water use efficiency of rice and reduce nitrogen loss from paddy fields.In the production practice of double-season late rice,the environmental effect of paddy field can be improved by strengthening the water management at seedling and pre-tiller stages to reduce paddy leaching and nitrogen leaching loss.

ricefull growth periodplanting methodirrigation modewater use efficiencynitrogen loss

王廷金、时红、才硕、郭巧玲、刘现波、程婕、万绍媛

展开 >

东华理工大学 水资源与环境工程学院,江西 南昌 330013

江西省灌溉试验中心站,江西 南昌 330201

水稻 全生育期 种植方式 灌溉模式 水分利用效率 氮素损失

国家自然科学基金项目江西水利科技项目江西水利科技项目江西水利科技项目长江科学院开放研究基金

31960377202124ZDKT29202325ZDKT01KT201630CKWV2016400/KY

2024

江西农业大学学报
江西农业大学

江西农业大学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.748
ISSN:1000-2286
年,卷(期):2024.46(3)