摘要
文学与哲学的"跨界"、文学与史学的"跨界"、文学与艺术的"跨界",构成了文学史上三种主要的"跨界"现象,哲学史、史学史、艺术史、文学史等因而有不少共同的关注对象.在"跨界"现象的编纂处理中,文学史的学科边界以两种方式清晰地呈现出来:首先,中国文学史是否给予一个历史人物较多篇幅,依据的是其文学史地位,而不是哲学史、史学史或艺术史地位.其二,文学史面向历史上的文学活动,而哲学史、史学史、艺术史等面向历史上的哲学活动、史学活动或艺术活动,它们有不同的知识体系、不同的描述重点、不同的评价尺度.
Abstract
The"transboundary"of literature and philosophy,the"transboundary"of literature and history and the"transboundary"of literature and art constitute three main"transboundary"phenom-ena in the history of literature,so there are many common objects of concern in the history of philoso-phy,history of historiography,art history,literature history,etc.In the codification of the"trans-boundary"phenomenon,the disciplinary boundaries of literary history are clearly presented in two ways:firstly,whether the history of Chinese literature gives more space to a historical figure is based on its status in literary history,rather than in the history of philosophy,historiography,or art history;secondly,the history of literature is oriented towards literary activities in history,while the history of philosophy,history of historiography,art history,etc.,are oriented towards philosophical activities,historiography activities or artistic activities in history.They have different knowledge systems,differ-ent descriptive emphases,and different evaluation scales.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据