首页|全麻诱导期预注不同剂量艾司氯胺酮对老年患者血流动力学的影响

全麻诱导期预注不同剂量艾司氯胺酮对老年患者血流动力学的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨老年患者血流动力学受全麻诱导期预注不同剂量艾司氯胺酮影响.方法 选择 80 例在我医院行眼科手术的 65~75 岁老年患者,按随机数字表法分为四组.对照组常规诱导组(N组),观察组三组:艾司氯胺酮 0.2 mg/kg组(S1组)、艾司氯胺酮 0.4 mg/kg组(S2 组)、艾司氯胺酮 0.6 mg/kg组(S3 组),每组 20 例.对照组顺序静脉注射舒芬太尼 3 μg/kg、丙泊酚 1.5 mg/kg、顺式阿曲库胺 0.2 mg/kg;观察组S1、S2、S3 组在常规诱导前,分别给予静脉注射艾司氯胺酮 0.2 mg/kg、艾司氯胺酮 0.4 mg/kg、艾司氯胺酮 0.6 mg/kg,再予静脉顺序注射与对照组相同的药物.记录四组患者麻醉诱导前(T0)、诱导后2 min(T1)、插管时(T2)、插管后 1 min(T3)、插管后 3 min(T4)、插管后 10 min(T5)的平均动脉压、心率.结果 与N组比较,S1、S2组T4 时HR明显升高;T1、T2、T3、T4 时MAP明显升高.与N组、S1 组、S2 组比较,S3 组T1、T2、T3、T4 时HR、MAP均明显升高,T5 时HR明显升高(P<0.05).四组恶心呕吐、术后躁动发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).N组多巴胺使用例数明显多于S1、S2、S3 组(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义.结论 老年患者全麻诱导期预注艾司氯胺酮 0.2 mg/kg或 0.4 mg/kg与诱导剂量0.6 mg/kg相比,在避免血流动力学剧烈波动的同时不增加恶心呕吐等副作用,对临床艾司氯胺酮的使用提供一定的参考作用.
The effect on hemodynamics in elderly patients by pre-injection of different doses of esketamine during the induction pe-riod of general anesthesia
Objective To explore the effect on hemodynamics in elderly patients by pre-injection of different doses of eske-tamine during the induction period of general anesthesia.Methods 80 elderly patients aged 65~75 who underwent eye operations in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into four groups with 20 cases each,according to the random number table method.The control group was given conventional induction(N group);Three observer groups:group S1 was given 0.2 mg/kg eske-tamine,group S2 was given 0.4 mg/kg esketamine,and group S3 was 0.6 mg/kg esketamine.The control group received intravenous injection of sufentanil 3 μg/kg,propofol 1.5 mg/kg,and cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg;observation group S1,S2,and S3 were respec-tively given intravenous injection of eskatamine 0.2 mg/kg,0.4 mg/kg,0.6 mg/kg before induction of general anesthesia,then the same drugs as the control group were injected intravenously sequentially.Arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)were record-ed,before induction(T0),2 min after induction(T1),at the moment of intubation(T2),at 1 min(T3),3 min(T4),10 min(T5)after in-tubation.Results Compered with the group N,HR in group S1,S2 at T4 were obviously higher and MAP at T1,T2,T3,T4 were ob-viously higher.Compered with group N,group S1,S2,MAP and HR in group S3 at T1,T2,T3,T4 were obviously higher and HR at T5 were obviously higher(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rates of nausea,vomiting,and postoperative agitation among the four groups(P<0.05).The number of cases of dopamine use in group N was significantly greater than that in groups S1,S2,and S3(P<0.05),and the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion Compared with the pre-in-jection of eskatamine 0.2 mg/kg or 0.4 mg/kg and 0.6 mg/kg during the induction period of general anesthesia in elderly patients,it avoids severe fluctuations in hemodynamics and does not increase side effects such as nausea and vomiting.The use of ketamine provides a certain reference.

esketamineagedinduction of general anesthesiastress response

赖爱华、余波、李俊、周清武、张璜

展开 >

南昌大学附属眼科医院麻醉科,南昌 330006

艾司氯胺酮 老年 全麻诱导 应激反应

2024

江西医药
江西省医学会

江西医药

影响因子:0.793
ISSN:1006-2238
年,卷(期):2024.59(11)