首页|《经传释词》"为"字条辨析

《经传释词》"为"字条辨析

扫码查看
《经传释词》在虚词研究上的贡献和不足,前人多有论述,但对其中的义项和例句,则缺乏全面详细的辨析.本文选取其中义项较多的"为"字条,对其义项和例句逐一进行检视,观察其例句的分析是否正确,义项的设立是否合理.文章认为"犹用也""犹使也""犹则也""犹与也""犹有也"五个义项是不能成立的;"犹于也""犹谓也""语助也"虽可成立,其中部分例句分析有误.文章还从历时的角度,分析了"犹将也""犹如也""语助也"三个义项的来源.
The Discrimination of the Explanation of Wei("为")in Jing Zhuan Shi Ci
Although the merits and limitations of Jing Zhuan Shi Ci(经传释词)in the study of functional words have been widely discussed by previous researchers,yet there remains a lack of comprehensive and detailed analysis of its senses and example sentences.This paper scrutinizesWei(为),an lexeme encapsulating numerous senses,to validate the appropriateness of sentence analyses and the rationale behind the interpretation of senses.It is argued that the interpretation of the five senses,namely Yong(犹用也),Shi(犹使也),Ze(犹则也),Yu(犹与也)and You(犹 有也)lacks reasonability.While the establishment of senses of Yu(犹于也),Wei(犹谓 也),and Yuzhu(语 助也)is plausible,errors permeate their respective example sentence analyses.The paper also delves into the origins of three senses Jiang(犹将也),Ru(犹如也)and Yuzhu(语助也)from a diachronic perspective.

Jing Zhuan Shi Ci(经传释词)Wei(为)sensequasi-copulagrammaticalization

孙洪伟

展开 >

中山大学中文系,广州 510275

《经传释词》 "为" 义项 准系词 语法化

高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目

18JJD74002

2024

嘉应学院学报
嘉应学院

嘉应学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.25
ISSN:1006-642X
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 12